2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory and field measurements of the modification of radar backscatter by sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2e, f). Under HV polarization (which better captures lithological contrasts; Williams and Greeley, 2004;Won and Ryu, 2002), the sandier substrate typical of the Pliocene marine terrace has lower signal amplitude and is represented by darker pixels than most lithologic substrates. By contrast, the more highly weathered and clayey forested areas appear bright in the SAR image.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2e, f). Under HV polarization (which better captures lithological contrasts; Williams and Greeley, 2004;Won and Ryu, 2002), the sandier substrate typical of the Pliocene marine terrace has lower signal amplitude and is represented by darker pixels than most lithologic substrates. By contrast, the more highly weathered and clayey forested areas appear bright in the SAR image.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because sand deposits are also widespread on Mars, it is worthwhile to compare the values in Table 1 to dielectric properties of clean sand [ Williams and Greeley , 2001, 2004] and sand and alluvium from Egypt [ Schaber et al , 1986] (Table 2). Although these materials might not be ideal analogs for Mars, they were extremely dry, as would be expected for Martian surface materials.…”
Section: Dielectric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may also explain why more volume scattering was observed over this class compared to others like Smooth/Un-Vegetated Mudflat. Some authors have also observed significant attenuation over wet sand (Williams & Greely, 2001;Williams & Greeley, 2004), while others have also observed higher VV return over sand compared to HH and HV (Hugenholtz & van der Sanden, 2001), as was the case in this study. It is possible that this is due to greater sensitivity to Bragg scattering as a result of surface waves at these angles (Thompson et al, 1998;Pietroniro et al, 2005;Toyra et al, 2005).…”
Section: Water and Substratessupporting
confidence: 81%