2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory assessment of porous asphalt mixtures reinforced with synthetic fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proper amount of binder is required in order to coat properly the fibers. According to scientific literature, a maximum value of 20% on 𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 response is considered admissible [10,21]. Under the action of water, the particle loss of PA mixtures were higher as expected.…”
Section: Mechanical Responses 431 Particle Loss Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A proper amount of binder is required in order to coat properly the fibers. According to scientific literature, a maximum value of 20% on 𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 response is considered admissible [10,21]. Under the action of water, the particle loss of PA mixtures were higher as expected.…”
Section: Mechanical Responses 431 Particle Loss Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The determination of air voids percentage is based on the on the permeability performance of OGFC. Fibers are commonly added to OGFC mixtures to increase durability; however, this has an impact on the interconnection of the air void distribution and permeability performance [10]. Anik Gupta et al [11] investigated the impact of different aramid fibers on the permeability and the study results showed slight permeability decreases, which might be due to fibers blocking some of the air voids in the mixes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations have reported advances in behaviour of Fibre Reinforced Asphalt Concretes (FRAC) [3,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. However, all mentioned works refer to short fibres (length \ 25 mm, less than the maximum size of the aggregate).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%