2017
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory exercise for studying the morphology of heat‐denatured and amyloid aggregates of lysozyme by atomic force microscopy

Abstract: To facilitate learning advanced instrumental techniques, essential tools for visualizing biomaterials, a simple and versatile laboratory exercise demonstrating the use of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) in biomedical applications was developed. In this experiment, the morphology of heat-denatured and amyloid-type aggregates formed from a low-cost and well-characterized model protein, hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL), are compared. Structural differences between the amorphous and ordered particles are quantified usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the calculated diameters of the nanoparticles from SEM images were higher (more than doubled) than those determined from AFM size analysis. The AFM methodology is considerably different than SEM as it provides a 3D topographical image, which is used to determine the height as the diameter in the z -direction. One of the main factors that may explain the size difference is that AFM analysis of EGaPs is done by selecting particles individually, while the SEM software measures the diameter of all particles within an image without individual selection. Another factor is that EGaPs might be flattened (wetting the surface of the substrate) due to the presence of the oxide layer, which would reduce the height and increase the width .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the calculated diameters of the nanoparticles from SEM images were higher (more than doubled) than those determined from AFM size analysis. The AFM methodology is considerably different than SEM as it provides a 3D topographical image, which is used to determine the height as the diameter in the z -direction. One of the main factors that may explain the size difference is that AFM analysis of EGaPs is done by selecting particles individually, while the SEM software measures the diameter of all particles within an image without individual selection. Another factor is that EGaPs might be flattened (wetting the surface of the substrate) due to the presence of the oxide layer, which would reduce the height and increase the width .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%