2012
DOI: 10.2514/1.t3612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Investigation of the Active Nitridation of Graphite by Atomic Nitrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This point has been recognized in several previous studies. 11,15 As discussed above, the N-C bond is minimally stable in DFTB relative to the asymptote, which is consistent with the simulation results. The underbinding of N in DFTB relative to the DFT results suggests that the nitrogen atom should perhaps be significantly more sticky and reactive than revealed in the current simulations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This point has been recognized in several previous studies. 11,15 As discussed above, the N-C bond is minimally stable in DFTB relative to the asymptote, which is consistent with the simulation results. The underbinding of N in DFTB relative to the DFT results suggests that the nitrogen atom should perhaps be significantly more sticky and reactive than revealed in the current simulations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…14 Another study of mass-loss measurements from samples of purified graphite (TS = 873 -1373 K) exposed to N atoms showed reaction probabilities of 0.2 -9.8 × 10 -3 . 15 To obtain 4 information on the mechanism of the mass loss, products resulting from such reactions have also been detected using various techniques. [16][17][18] It was found that the dominant product was C2N2, which might have been produced via condensation of the nascent CN radicals produced by the reaction of atomic N with the carbon surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 31 on a high-purity graphite clearly shows that this value is too high: the rate for nitridation reaction was found to be 100 times smaller than the one in Park's model. This confirms that a rate in order of magnitude similar to the one used by Driver et al is probably more accurate.…”
Section: A Argon Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Recent experiments conducted by Zhang et al [40] on a high-purity graphite clearly show that this value is too high: the rate for the nitridation reaction was found to be 100 times smaller than that in the Park et al [6,13] and Park and Bogdanoff's [28] model . This confirms that a rate that is an order of magnitude similar to the one used by Driver and MacLean [26] is probably more accurate.…”
Section: Parametermentioning
confidence: 86%