1995
DOI: 10.26686/nzjir.v20i1.3260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labour Market Adjustment and Women in the Service Industry: A Survey

Abstract: The celebration in 1993 of a century of women's suffrage in New Zealand has brought even more sharply into focus the uneven impact of the Employment Contracts Act on the workforce. From the outset, debate about the effects of the Employrnent Contracts Act had focused for some on the likely impacts on women workers. This study is located firmly within the tradition of national and international literature front a range of disciplines including economics, industrial relations, sociology:- law and history, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although New Zealand research on non-standard employment is often descriptive and gives little indication why there has been an increase or slight decline in the level of non-standard employment over the past 20 years, there is general agreement that the employment environment vis a vis the economy, the regulatory environment, the level of power of either the employers and trade unions, has a direct influence. There was no doubt that as a result of labour market reforms of the late 1980s and 1990s and the with the introduction of the Employment Contracts Act 1991, New Zealanders witnessed a reversal in conditions and wages, for example the withdrawal of penal rates, the dismantling of industry-specific safety provisions and the erosion of limits on hours of work, etc (Harbridge and Street 1994;Rasmussen and Lamm 2002).…”
Section: Figure 3 Changes In Patterns Of Full and Part-time Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although New Zealand research on non-standard employment is often descriptive and gives little indication why there has been an increase or slight decline in the level of non-standard employment over the past 20 years, there is general agreement that the employment environment vis a vis the economy, the regulatory environment, the level of power of either the employers and trade unions, has a direct influence. There was no doubt that as a result of labour market reforms of the late 1980s and 1990s and the with the introduction of the Employment Contracts Act 1991, New Zealanders witnessed a reversal in conditions and wages, for example the withdrawal of penal rates, the dismantling of industry-specific safety provisions and the erosion of limits on hours of work, etc (Harbridge and Street 1994;Rasmussen and Lamm 2002).…”
Section: Figure 3 Changes In Patterns Of Full and Part-time Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1996;Kelsey 1997). The 1991 Employment Contracts Act facilitated an employment relations transformation that was extraordinary, moving from a century-old conciliation and arbitration system with extensive state regulation to a very decentralized bargaining system (Dannin 1997;Harbridge 1993). As the award system was abolished, so were collectively negotiated regulations over part-time employment, since unions quickly lost most of their bargaining power under the Employment Contracts Act.…”
Section: New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1994). The studies show that in small businesses are predominately nonunionised (Buultjens, 1994) and that wage rates are often lower, jobs less secure (Harbridge & Street. 1994.…”
Section: Employment In the Small Business Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of labour market reforms commenc ing in the late 1980s, New Zealanders have seen a reversal in condi-tions and wages, for example the withdrawal of penal rates, the dismantling of industry-specific safety provisions and the erosion of limits on hours of work, etc (Harbridge & Street, 1994: Rasmussen & Lamm, 1999. Additionally, many vulnerable employees are not aware of their rights (Gieisner & Rasmussen, 1995).…”
Section: Precarious Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation