Labour market interventions to assist the unemployed in two townships in South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: Given the absence of organised and accessible information on programmes relating to unemployment in South Africa, it may be difficult for beneficiaries to derive value from existing programmes; and for stakeholders to identify possible gaps in order to direct their initiatives accordingly.Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a review of existing employment initiatives within two low-income communities in South Africa, with the aim of identifying possible gaps in better addressing the needs of the unemployed.Motivation for the study: Unemployment in South Africa does not appear to be the result of a lack of initiatives or a lack of stakeholder involvement, but rather the result of haphazard implementation of interventions. In order to intervene more effectively, addressing the identified gaps, organising and better distribution of information for beneficiaries is suggested.Research approach, design and method: The data were collected via documentary research complemented with structured interviews. Relevant documents (N = 166) and participants (N = 610) were consulted during the data collection phase, using convenience and purposive sampling.Main findings: A total of 496 unemployment programmes were identified. Most of the interventions were implemented by the government. Vocational training followed by enterprise development and business skills training were the most implemented programmes. Less than 6% of programmes contained psychosocial aspects that are necessary to help the unemployed deal with the psychological consequences of unemployment. Finally, in general, benefactors involved in alleviating unemployment seem unaware of employment initiatives in their communities.Practical and managerial implications: The compilation of an inventory of employment programmes may be valuable, as it will assist in identifying the most prominent needs of the South African labour market.Contribution or value-add: This study contributes to scientific knowledge regarding the availability of existing unemployment programmes, projects and interventions, and the need for specific interventions.

The Implementation and Evaluation of the South African Adaptation of the JOBS Program

“…This paper intended to apply a South African version of the JOBS program, called the Qhubekela Phambili career-enhancement program. Suggestions pertaining to the implementation and evaluation of the JOBS program made in Paver et al (2019b) were adhered to.…”

“…To better understand the mechanisms of the JOBS program and its effects, Paver et al (2019b) conducted a literature review of the JOBS program and variations thereof. The current study is executed based on suggestions made to effectively implement and evaluate the JOBS program (see Supplementary Material ; Paver et al, 2018 ).…”

“…This manuscript has been released in a repository at https://repository.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/33069 , Paver (2019) .…”

Positive Organizational Interventions: Contemporary Theories, Approaches and Applications

“…To better understand the mechanisms of the JOBS program and its effects, Paver et al (2019b) conducted a literature review of the JOBS program and variations thereof. The current study is executed based on suggestions made to effectively implement and evaluate the JOBS program (see Supplementary Material; Paver et al, 2018).…”

Profiling the unemployed from selected communities in South Africa based on their experiences, commitment to employment, and job search behaviour

“…Unemployment is a challenging issue and is not only a significant economic and societal burden (e.g., criminality, family breakdown, poverty, and substance abuse) on countries, but also a psychological burden on most unemployed individuals (Bernstein, 2019; Brand, 2015). Despite the high unemployment rate and the associated detrimental psychological consequences, few psychologically oriented unemployment interventions exist within the South African context (Paver et al, 2019). We should, however, caution against blindly developing and implementing such interventions because ‘the unemployed’ may not be a homogeneous group (Knopf, 2013), and meta-analytic evidence shows that interventions tailored to the specific groups are more effective than one-size-fits-all approaches (Liu et al, 2014).…”