2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-020-03770-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of oxidative damage on temperate juvenile catsharks after a long-term ocean acidification exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, no significant effects of either treatment were observed over hypoxia tolerance (Figure 6B; Supplementary Table 3), despite previous indication that these two responses may be intertwined (Butler and Taylor, 1975;Ely et al, 2014;Bouyoucos et al, 2020a). Likewise, cell stress levels, particularly oxidative damage, appear not to be affected by EA (Figure 6C; Supplementary Table 3), with elasmobranchs relying on non-enzymatic ROS-scavengers in addition to enzymatic antioxidants, which may be a potential explanation for their resilience (Lopes et al, 2018;Pegado et al, 2020a). However, this same response has rarely been addressed under EW and EWA, despite more evidence suggesting potentially considerable effects of these treatments over elasmobranchs and other taxa (Lesser, 2006;Rosa et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Tolerance and Stress Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…On the other hand, no significant effects of either treatment were observed over hypoxia tolerance (Figure 6B; Supplementary Table 3), despite previous indication that these two responses may be intertwined (Butler and Taylor, 1975;Ely et al, 2014;Bouyoucos et al, 2020a). Likewise, cell stress levels, particularly oxidative damage, appear not to be affected by EA (Figure 6C; Supplementary Table 3), with elasmobranchs relying on non-enzymatic ROS-scavengers in addition to enzymatic antioxidants, which may be a potential explanation for their resilience (Lopes et al, 2018;Pegado et al, 2020a). However, this same response has rarely been addressed under EW and EWA, despite more evidence suggesting potentially considerable effects of these treatments over elasmobranchs and other taxa (Lesser, 2006;Rosa et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Tolerance and Stress Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As they are deposited in coastal areas experiencing fluctuations in oxygen availability [ 27 , 28 ], the species may have developed adaptations to avoid the occurrence of oxidative stress throughout its evolution. Furthermore, sharks are known to produce a high level of nonenzymatic ROS scavengers involved in the prevention of oxidative damage, such as ascorbic and uric acids, carotenoids, reduced glutathione, and amino acids [ 37 , 44 , 45 ]. ROS scavengers have a low molecular weight, act as complementary antioxidant defense system, and are prevalent in sharks [ 44 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROS scavengers have a low molecular weight, act as complementary antioxidant defense system, and are prevalent in sharks [ 44 , 46 ]. In a previous study with S. canicula juveniles exposed to long-term and high CO 2 conditions, there was also no evidence of oxidative damage [ 45 ]. The same finding was observed for the tropical benthic shark Chiloscyllium plagiosum in which their exposure to a high level of CO 2 for 50 days did not elicit oxidative damage [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%