2002
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2002.890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lactation and Function of Curve Parameters in Yankasa Sheep

Abstract: The accuracy of the gamma function to describe lactation curve of Yankasa ewes was investigated using milk production data obtained from 168 ewes with either complete or incomplete 84 day lactation records. Ewes were daily hand milked after over-night separation from lamb and thorough disinfection of the udder. The daily milk yield on the average was estimated from the weekly total yield. The effect of type of birth, parity, season of birth and lactation length on the components of lactation curve (a, b, c and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported higher milk yields of sheep carrying twins in comparison to singles (Afolayan et al, 2002;Gootwine and Pollott, 2000). Higher MSmax values of ewes bearing twins could explain, although showing only a trend (P = 0.09), the observed differences in milk production between single and twin-bearing ewes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Previous studies have reported higher milk yields of sheep carrying twins in comparison to singles (Afolayan et al, 2002;Gootwine and Pollott, 2000). Higher MSmax values of ewes bearing twins could explain, although showing only a trend (P = 0.09), the observed differences in milk production between single and twin-bearing ewes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, it differs from the results by Peniche et al (2015), Allah et al (2011), andPeralta-Lailson et al (2005) in terms of the dates of time until the peak of lactation, since in these studies the dates were weeks seven, five and one, respectively. These differences Afolayan et al (2002) also found that the parameters a, b, and c were higher in ewes with two lambs, which suggests that the number of lambs suckled by the ewe has an important influence on the MP, which has been found before in other sheep breeds (Snowder and Glimp, 1991). On the other hand, Afolayan et al (2002) the parameters of Wood's model that have been estimated in dairy ewes are a0.…”
Section: One Lamb Two Lambsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These differences Afolayan et al (2002) also found that the parameters a, b, and c were higher in ewes with two lambs, which suggests that the number of lambs suckled by the ewe has an important influence on the MP, which has been found before in other sheep breeds (Snowder and Glimp, 1991). On the other hand, Afolayan et al (2002) the parameters of Wood's model that have been estimated in dairy ewes are a0. 979, b0.071, c0.009 (Ángeles-Hernández et al, 2013), a1,333, b0.3, c0.092 (Miguel et al, 2016; in these studies, the magnitude of parameter a standout, which represents milk production at the beginning of the lactation, indicating specialized breeds in milk production.…”
Section: One Lamb Two Lambsmentioning
confidence: 61%