2002
DOI: 10.1097/00005176-200209000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lactobacillus plantarum Reduces the In Vitro Secretory Response of Intestinal Epithelial Cells to Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Infection

Abstract: LBP can play an important role in reducing the secretory change in response to EPEC infection, possibly through inhibition of its binding. However, the presence of the probiotic agent before the infection is necessary. In this setting, its role is more preventive rather than therapeutic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several mechanisms are considered to be responsible for the beneficial clinical effects of probiotics, including an interaction with pathogenic bacteria (Michail and Abernathy, 2002;Patzer et al, 2003), an increase of the hosts' immune response (Schultz et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2006;Díaz-Ropero et al, 2007;Schlee et al, 2008) and a production of antimicrobial substances such as organic acids, hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins (Reid et al, 2003). The observed clinical effects are very likely a combination of a 'direct competition' between pathogenic bacteria and probiotics as well as various beneficial effects on the hosts' immune response (Kligler and Cohrssen, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mechanisms are considered to be responsible for the beneficial clinical effects of probiotics, including an interaction with pathogenic bacteria (Michail and Abernathy, 2002;Patzer et al, 2003), an increase of the hosts' immune response (Schultz et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2006;Díaz-Ropero et al, 2007;Schlee et al, 2008) and a production of antimicrobial substances such as organic acids, hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins (Reid et al, 2003). The observed clinical effects are very likely a combination of a 'direct competition' between pathogenic bacteria and probiotics as well as various beneficial effects on the hosts' immune response (Kligler and Cohrssen, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yeasts, such as Saccharomyces boulardii, have also been studied and are widely used for probiotic purposes (4)(5)(6). The mechanisms responsible for the positive effects of probiotics on the gastrointestinal system are adhesion and colonization to intestinal mucosa, production of antibacterial factors, competition with bacterial substrates, and stimulation of mucosal and systemic immunities (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[53,54] Other mechanisms proposed by which probiotics might exert their activity against pathogens are competition for nutrients required for growth of pathogens [55,56] ,competitive inhibition of adhesion of pathogens [57][58][59][60] ,and modification of toxins and toxin receptors. [61,62] …”
Section: Acute Infectious Diarrheamentioning
confidence: 99%