1986
DOI: 10.1306/94886c90-1704-11d7-8645000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lacustrine and Fluvial-Deltaic Depositional Systems, Fort Union Formation (Paleocene), Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slake durability tests indicated stronger rock (93% durability index) from the Wasatch Formation compared to a durability index of 89% for rock from the Fort Union Formation. Such results align with the presence of substantial sandstone in the Wasatch Formation [26] compared to the higher content of shales and mudstones in the Fort Union Formation [44]. Correspondingly, the grain size distribution analysis indicated a greater fraction of claysized particles (7.6%) present in the Fort Union waste rock.…”
Section: Waste Rock Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slake durability tests indicated stronger rock (93% durability index) from the Wasatch Formation compared to a durability index of 89% for rock from the Fort Union Formation. Such results align with the presence of substantial sandstone in the Wasatch Formation [26] compared to the higher content of shales and mudstones in the Fort Union Formation [44]. Correspondingly, the grain size distribution analysis indicated a greater fraction of claysized particles (7.6%) present in the Fort Union waste rock.…”
Section: Waste Rock Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Large concentrations of Al and silicon (Si) were present in the Wasatch and Fort Union waste rock, reflective of the dominant aluminosilicate minerals that compose these fluvial and lacustrine deposits [20,26] (Figure 4). Larger concentrations of redox-sensitive elements of Fe and Mn were present in the Fort Union waste rock, which are indicative of the lowenergy paleoenvironments associated with certain units of the Fort Union Formation [43,44]. The slake durability tests indicated stronger rock (93% durability index) from the Wasatch Formation compared to a durability index of 89% for rock from the Fort Union Formation.…”
Section: Waste Rock Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most of the previous work in the Powder River Basin has been focused in the northwestern, central, and southern parts of the basin (for example, Stone and Calvert, 1910;Rogers and Lee, 1923;Bryson and Bass, 1971;Ayers, 1986;Hanley and Flores, 1987;Warwick and Stanton, 1988;Rice and Flores, 1991;Nichols and others, 1992;Brown, 1993;Nichols, 1994;Rice and others, 2002;Nichols, 2003;Vuke and others, 2007). In the northeastern corner of the Powder River Basin near the Miles City Arch, the coal fields were intensely studied at the turn of the century for their mineral potential (Leonard, 1907;Collier and Smith, 1909;Bowen, 1910;Herald, 1910;Rogers, 1911;Calvert, 1912).…”
Section: Lithostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%