2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ladder-type aromatic block copolymers containing sulfonated triphenylphosphine oxide moieties as proton conductive membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the higher IEC value, CSPPSU‐4S showed slightly larger ionic clusters (ca., 3 nm in diameter) than that (ca., 1.5 nm in diameter) of CSPPSU‐2S. It is well‐known that such distinct phase‐separated morphology promotes proton conductivity, which is accountable for higher proton conductivity of CSPPSU‐4S than that of CSPPSU‐2S. Relatively small ionic clusters could cause some dead‐end channels at low RH to cause the low conductivity as discussed above (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Due to the higher IEC value, CSPPSU‐4S showed slightly larger ionic clusters (ca., 3 nm in diameter) than that (ca., 1.5 nm in diameter) of CSPPSU‐2S. It is well‐known that such distinct phase‐separated morphology promotes proton conductivity, which is accountable for higher proton conductivity of CSPPSU‐4S than that of CSPPSU‐2S. Relatively small ionic clusters could cause some dead‐end channels at low RH to cause the low conductivity as discussed above (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In-plane and through-plane swellings of SQF-4 membrane were 3.7 and 5.4 times higher than those of the SQF-2 membrane (Table S2). Compared to the SPP-QP membrane, the SQF-3 membrane with comparable IEC value showed lower water uptake and λ value probably because of the distinct well-developed phase-separated morphology mentioned above (the absorbed water molecules would be mostly present in the vicinity of sulfonic acid groups in the hydrophilic domain) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Compared to the SPP-QP membrane, the SQF-3 membrane with comparable IEC value showed lower water uptake and λ value probably because of the distinct welldeveloped phase-separated morphology mentioned above (the absorbed water molecules would be mostly present in the vicinity of sulfonic acid groups in the hydrophilic domain). 18 The proton conductivity of the SQF membranes was measured at 80 °C and plotted as a function of RH in Figure 5a. The SQF-4 membrane showed the highest proton conductivity, reaching 405 mS cm −1 , ca.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Sqfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] We have also demonstrated that introducing ladder structure based on the intra-polymer Heck reaction increased the rigidity of the polymer chain resulting in the improved mechanical stability of aromatic PEMs. 21,22 Those methods required additional functional groups (carboxyl, bromo groups, etc. ), or metal catalysts for the post-cross-linking reactions, which resulted in the high production cost and/or synthetic complexity of the PEMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%