2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007gc001584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrangian hydrocode simulations of the 1958 Lituya Bay tsunamigenic rockslide

Abstract: [1] The interaction of debris flows, whether subaqueous or subaerial, with bodies of water can produce tsunamis with a locally devastating impact. When debris flows begin above the water surface, the impact can produce a large air cavity, corresponding to a large effective volume of water displaced and complicating efforts to model the resulting tsunami. Because grid-based, Eulerian numerical methods have an inherent difficulty tracking material boundaries, we have implemented a particle-based, Lagrangian mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, the computational problem is defined and preliminary computational results are shown which, following the method of Schwaiger & Higman [10], include a laminar approach for both phases and a gravitational acceleration for the landslide which retains its rheological characteristics without considering any saturation effects. This preliminary analysis shows that although ISPH with shifting and non-Newtonian rheology can improve upon the results of Schwaiger & Higman [10] it fails to capture both the wave run up and landslide-entry profile presented in the benchmark experimental work of Fritz et al [2]. This motivates further investigations into the physical phenomena during the landslide-tsunami process, which leads to the introduction of a RANS turbulence model for the water phase and a saturation model for the landslide.…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Initially, the computational problem is defined and preliminary computational results are shown which, following the method of Schwaiger & Higman [10], include a laminar approach for both phases and a gravitational acceleration for the landslide which retains its rheological characteristics without considering any saturation effects. This preliminary analysis shows that although ISPH with shifting and non-Newtonian rheology can improve upon the results of Schwaiger & Higman [10] it fails to capture both the wave run up and landslide-entry profile presented in the benchmark experimental work of Fritz et al [2]. This motivates further investigations into the physical phenomena during the landslide-tsunami process, which leads to the introduction of a RANS turbulence model for the water phase and a saturation model for the landslide.…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Initial comparisons with the weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method of Schwaiger & Higman [10] Initially, a laminar approach is considered for both the landslide and the water phases (following [10]). Moreover, the landslide is accelerated only under the influence of gravity.…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A generalized viscoplastic fluid model was used to describe the landslide. Schwaiger and Higman (2007) applied a Newtonian fluid model in the SPH method for the landslide.…”
Section: Fast Landslidementioning
confidence: 99%