Sedimentation in Volcanic Settings 1991
DOI: 10.2110/pec.91.45.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lahars: Volcano-Hydrologic Events and Deposition in the Debris Flow—hyperconcentrated Flow Continuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
249
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
249
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Stream flows are muddy water streams with a sediment concentration below 20% in volume. Lahars however, can be further separated according to their sediment concentration: into hyperconcentrated flows between 20 and 50-60% in volume, and into debris flows if the volumetric sediment concentration is higher than 50-60% (Pierson and Scott, 1985;Pierson, 1986;Smith and Lowe, 1991;Coussot and Meunier, 1996;Vallance, 2000;Lavigne and Thouret, 2002). The lahars simulated in this study represent debris flow types with sediment concentrations similar to the observed ice-melt-triggered lahars on Popocatépetl in City, the study area and Puebla is derived from SRTM3 elevation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Stream flows are muddy water streams with a sediment concentration below 20% in volume. Lahars however, can be further separated according to their sediment concentration: into hyperconcentrated flows between 20 and 50-60% in volume, and into debris flows if the volumetric sediment concentration is higher than 50-60% (Pierson and Scott, 1985;Pierson, 1986;Smith and Lowe, 1991;Coussot and Meunier, 1996;Vallance, 2000;Lavigne and Thouret, 2002). The lahars simulated in this study represent debris flow types with sediment concentrations similar to the observed ice-melt-triggered lahars on Popocatépetl in City, the study area and Puebla is derived from SRTM3 elevation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In general, lahars can be divided into those that are a direct result of eruptive activity and those that are not temporally related to eruptions (Smith & Lowe 1991). The former may be generated by eruption-induced sector collapses, eruptions through crater lakes, melting of debris-laden snow and ice by hot pyroclastic materials, mixing of pyroclastic flows or other large volumes of volcanic debris with water, and evolution by gravity segregation within pyroclastic surges (Janda et al 1981;Boudon et al 1987;Siebert et al 1987;Major & Newhall 1989;Vallance & Scott 1997;Mothes et al 1998;Waythomas 1999).…”
Section: Triggering Mechanisms and Sediment Sources For Laharsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). Type A deposits are characteristic of hyperconcentrated flow that is transitional to dilute debris flow, based on particle-size distributions and sedimentary structures (Pierson and Scott 1985Smith 1986, Scott 1988Smith and Lowe 1991;Pierson 2005). The type A deposit at the base of the Bluff Section has a hard consistence and may have been emplaced by fully formed debris flow.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Deposits and The Lahar-flood Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type A deposit at the base of the Bluff Section has a hard consistence and may have been emplaced by fully formed debris flow. Type B deposits are characteristic of both dilute hyperconcentrated flow (Smith 1986;Smith and Lowe 1991;Pierson 2005) and muddy streamflow under upper-flow-regime (generally supercritical turbulent flow) conditions (Harms et al 1963;Simons et al 1965;McKee et al 1967). The high fines contents and poor sorting of the deposits indicate that emplacement occurred by a flow close to the transition between hyperconcentrated flow and muddy streamflow.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Deposits and The Lahar-flood Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%