1968
DOI: 10.1115/1.3601284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar Flow Along a Vertical Wall

Abstract: An analytical study is presented which describes the laminar accelerating flow of a thin film falling along a vertical wall. The approximate mathematical solution is given with emphasis on the growth and decrease of the boundary layer and film thickness, respectively. These resultant solutions are given in closed form and are found dependent upon two-dimensionless variables: φ2=3U0νgh02 and ζ2=1+2gh0x¯U02.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buchanan (1967) assumed that films on facets passed through different flow regimes as operating conditions were varied, and based his holdup prediction on the two limiting ones, called the gravity-inertia and the gravity-viscosity regime (Figure 2b). The gravity-inertia regime is in fact one-dimensional potential flow, which has been used in falling film hydrodynamics to model entry flow (such as Haugen, 1968;Anderson and Ytrehus, 1985), and the gravity-viscosity regime is just developed laminar flow. In the final form the expression for holdup is: The first term describes the gravity-viscosity and the second the gravity-inertia regime, Fr denotes the Froude number defined as r2/(gdj) and coefficients 2.2 and 1.8 are adjustable constants, of which the second incorporates a factor for the assumed energy loss at facet joints.…”
Section: Models Of Holdup In Conventional Packed Bedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Buchanan (1967) assumed that films on facets passed through different flow regimes as operating conditions were varied, and based his holdup prediction on the two limiting ones, called the gravity-inertia and the gravity-viscosity regime (Figure 2b). The gravity-inertia regime is in fact one-dimensional potential flow, which has been used in falling film hydrodynamics to model entry flow (such as Haugen, 1968;Anderson and Ytrehus, 1985), and the gravity-viscosity regime is just developed laminar flow. In the final form the expression for holdup is: The first term describes the gravity-viscosity and the second the gravity-inertia regime, Fr denotes the Froude number defined as r2/(gdj) and coefficients 2.2 and 1.8 are adjustable constants, of which the second incorporates a factor for the assumed energy loss at facet joints.…”
Section: Models Of Holdup In Conventional Packed Bedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissipative forces, be they laminar or turbulent, are negligible. Such flow is potential and we assume also that it is one-dimensional, as has been done often in the study of falling films (Haugen, 1968;Andersson and Ytrehus, 1985). The resulting particle-scale problem is shown in Figure 2b-left.…”
Section: Aiche Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical solution for the film thickness under fully developed conditions may be written as follows: δnormalfdδnormalin=()3thinmathspaceFrLReL1/3=α1/3 where α is a parameter used by Haugen, Roy, and Lawrence and Rao …”
Section: Comparisons With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where˛is a parameter used by Haugen, [6] Roy, [7] and Lawrence and Rao. [8] The analytical solution for velocity distribution in the liquid film in the fully-developed region is as follows:…”
Section: Fully Developed Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation