2012
DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2012.745395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land concentration and foreign land ownership in Argentina in the context of global land grabbing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
26
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though Chinese activity in land acquisitions in rural Africa display "asymmetries of power and patterns of exploitation very closely resembling core-periphery relations……Chinese land acquisitions in rural Australia are not captured well by a core-periphery label" (Margulis and Porter, 2013, this volume). Indeed the same applies to grabbed-land grabbers such as Brazil and Argentina which are both major players in the land acquisitions across South America but are also major targets of foreign land acquisitions (see, Perrone, 2013, this volume; see also Borras, Kay, Gomez and Wilkinson 2012;Murmis and Murmis, 2012;Urioste 2012). To a certain extent, land grabbing reveals important shifts in global political power but also in production of resources and goods that may be more vital to a future global political economy where the ecological considerations become more paramount.…”
Section: A Short History Of Global Land Governance and Structural Chamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though Chinese activity in land acquisitions in rural Africa display "asymmetries of power and patterns of exploitation very closely resembling core-periphery relations……Chinese land acquisitions in rural Australia are not captured well by a core-periphery label" (Margulis and Porter, 2013, this volume). Indeed the same applies to grabbed-land grabbers such as Brazil and Argentina which are both major players in the land acquisitions across South America but are also major targets of foreign land acquisitions (see, Perrone, 2013, this volume; see also Borras, Kay, Gomez and Wilkinson 2012;Murmis and Murmis, 2012;Urioste 2012). To a certain extent, land grabbing reveals important shifts in global political power but also in production of resources and goods that may be more vital to a future global political economy where the ecological considerations become more paramount.…”
Section: A Short History Of Global Land Governance and Structural Chamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All of these projects share the objective of promoting large-scale private-sector led investments in developing country agriculture and highlighting the weight of investments relative to that of policies. Meanwhile, dozens of countries are revisiting and reforming national and local land planning and tenure laws as well as their bilateral/multilateral trade, investment and development cooperation arrangements -and depending on the local politics, doing so to either facilitate (Wolford et al, 2013) or limit (Perrone, 2013, this volume;Murmis and Murmis, 2012;Wilkinson et al 2012) land grabbing domestically.…”
Section: Global Governance and Land Grabbingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the neoliberal turn of the 1980s, this region has gradually been subjected to a dynamic of socio‐economic integration that primarily affects local populations, including the Wichí. Since the beginning of the 2000s, we have witnessed the construction of road infrastructure to facilitate access to these remote areas, accompanied by a process of land grabbing (Murmis and Murmis 2012) and extremely rapid deforestation (Volante et al 2016). In this unprecedented context, the natives are mobilizing to claim their territories, contributing to the multiplication of land conflicts with both institutions and the settlers.…”
Section: Indigenous Peoples and Their Maps In Argentinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This co-produced worldview does not seem to leave any room for family farmers, who do not have the mind-sets of innovators-entrepreneurs and who are incapable of keeping up with ever-growing demands of Epistemic claims by and about farmers becoming innovatorsentrepreneurs are reciprocally conditioned by the rise of new social formations such as sowing pools (pooles de siembra), which are taken here as a central instance of this agricultural bioeconomy. Sowing pools can be seen as instantiating a new hegemonic organizational model of agribusiness (Grosso 2010;Murmis and Murmis 2012;Hernandez 2013, 2014). Sowing pools are defined as "agricultural trusts consisting of farmers seeking to extend their scale of production, who gather temporarily (usually one planting season) to lease tracts of land as well as services for the main farming operations (planting, spraying and harvesting) and sometimes for transport.…”
Section: Sowing Pools and The Rise Of Networked Agribusinessmentioning
confidence: 99%