2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12050754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land-Cover Changes to Surface-Water Buffers in the Midwestern USA: 25 Years of Landsat Data Analyses (1993–2017)

Abstract: To understand the timing, extent, and magnitude of land use/land cover (LULC) change in buffer areas surrounding Midwestern US waters, we analyzed the full imagery archive (1982–2017) of three Landsat footprints covering ~100,000 km2. The study area included urbanizing Chicago, Illinois and St. Louis, Missouri regions and agriculturally dominated landscapes (i.e., Peoria, Illinois). The Continuous Change Detection and Classification algorithm identified 1993–2017 LULC change across three Landsat footprints and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) algorithm used all spectral bands to detect various kinds of land cover change continuously [16,17]. It has been implemented into the USGS Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) program for generating land cover and land change products for the United States [18][19][20] and also widely used in many applications, such as urban expansion [19,21,22], hydrology dynamic [23], and forest disturbance [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) algorithm used all spectral bands to detect various kinds of land cover change continuously [16,17]. It has been implemented into the USGS Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) program for generating land cover and land change products for the United States [18][19][20] and also widely used in many applications, such as urban expansion [19,21,22], hydrology dynamic [23], and forest disturbance [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 9899 pixels were selected to form the validation data and the number of pixels for each land cover type was proportional to its area coverage. A minimum linear distance of 250 meters between any two validation pixels was used to reduce autocorrelation (Berhane et al., 2020). Besides, a total of 200 points of them were randomly selected for the field survey, and compared the LULC maps with high‐resolution images and field survey information to validate the accuracy of LULC classification in 2019.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected 9899 pixels proportional to the areal extent of each land cover as the validation dataset. We kept the minimum linear distance between any two pixels at 250 m (we selected this distance to reduce the potential for auto correlation) [31]. The user accuracy, producer accuracy, overall accuracy, and kappa coefficient of each land cover were calculated [32].…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%