2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land cover classification through Convolutional Neur-al Network model assembly: A case study of a local rural area in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It had higher accuracy than others, except for built-up. Although the built-up class had lower accuracy compared to other LULC classes, the prediction results of Fitton [54] showed an accuracy of 72% for the road class Radar pattern of accuracy metrics noted that ESRS performed better for cropland (Figure 5d) and grassland (Figure 5c) compared to other sampling schemes of this study; RSG was at the lowest level of precision, mainly due to their much higher sample size. For instance, SRS and RSG embraced 70.5% and 57.7% of the total reference data in grassland class, while there were no differences between the sampling schemes for built-up (Figure 5e).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It had higher accuracy than others, except for built-up. Although the built-up class had lower accuracy compared to other LULC classes, the prediction results of Fitton [54] showed an accuracy of 72% for the road class Radar pattern of accuracy metrics noted that ESRS performed better for cropland (Figure 5d) and grassland (Figure 5c) compared to other sampling schemes of this study; RSG was at the lowest level of precision, mainly due to their much higher sample size. For instance, SRS and RSG embraced 70.5% and 57.7% of the total reference data in grassland class, while there were no differences between the sampling schemes for built-up (Figure 5e).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For instance, SRS and RSG embraced 70.5% and 57.7% of the total reference data in grassland class, while there were no differences between the sampling schemes for built-up (Figure 5e). Inspecting the individual sampling design, accuracy metrics had a tendency toward worsening when the reference data were more randomly distributed among classes, notably for trees (Figure 5a) and built-up (Figure 5e) land uses, due to their small width relative to the tile size [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A specialised schema for enhancing the land cover identification [ 33 ] iteratively performs the assessment of the classification errors and lowers the error rate by creating new subclasses. Neural Networks (NNs) are the driving force in achieving state-of-the-art performance for land cover mapping, with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) being the most frequently used architectures [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), especially Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, have shown a strong potential in utilising temporal information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%