2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1848129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Reform as a Counterinsurgency Policy: Evidence from Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mindful of such potential to inflame tensions, the UNFCCC has adopted safeguards aimed at conflict prevention and securing the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities (UNFCCC 2011). Alternatively, land reforms, including individual or collective land title programs, could be implemented as strategies to reverse and reduce causes of conflicts and forest-loss (Albertus andKaplan 2012, Ostrom andNagendra 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mindful of such potential to inflame tensions, the UNFCCC has adopted safeguards aimed at conflict prevention and securing the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities (UNFCCC 2011). Alternatively, land reforms, including individual or collective land title programs, could be implemented as strategies to reverse and reduce causes of conflicts and forest-loss (Albertus andKaplan 2012, Ostrom andNagendra 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our work has obvious connections to a large literature on peasant rebellion (e.g., Migdal, 1974;Popkin, 1979;Scott, 1976;Wolf, 1967), including recent work that empirically estimates the relationship between land reform and insurgency (Albertus & Kaplan, 2012;Alston, Libecap, & Mueller, 2000). 4 Our finding that rebellion increased in response to emancipation, a package of reforms that included land redistribution, is consistent with the estimates in each of the latter articles, suggesting generalizability of our results beyond the context of 19th-century Russia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Even when an assertive land reform programme was sought, such as in the 1960s, little was done to curb countryside violence that, over the last 60 years, has cost 220,000 deaths, mostly of poor rural residents. In fact, even though land titling was conducted in many parts of the country, it was implemented piecemeal and incompletely, blocked in most areas by politically powerful large landholders, creating widespread levels of insurgent activity (Albertus & Kaplan 2013). Though it was possible for some sectors to thrive during the civil war years, particularly those better connected to legal and illegal global markets, the fact remains that for the country to fully realise its potential, a more inclusive path of political reconciliation has to be promoted.…”
Section: Land Accessibility the Quintessential Challengementioning
confidence: 99%