Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities

Abstract

Abstract:The main factors influencing the spatiotemporal variability of urban climate are quite widely recognized, including, for example, the thermal properties of materials used for surfaces and buildings, the mass, height and layout of the buildings themselves and patterns of land use. However, the roles played by particular factors vary from city to city with respect to differences in geographical location, overall size, number of inhabitants and more. In urban climatology, the concept of "local climate zones" (LCZs) has emerged over the past decade to address this heterogeneity. In this contribution, a new GIS-based method is used for LCZ delimitation in Prague and Brno, the two largest cities in the Czech Republic, while land surface temperatures (LSTs) derived from LANDSAT and ASTER satellite data are employed for exploring the extent to which LCZ classes discriminate with respect to LSTs. It has been suggested that correctly-delineated LCZs should demonstrate the features typical of LST variability, and thus, typical surface temperatures should differ significantly among most LCZs. Zones representing heavy industry (LCZ 10), dense low-rise buildings (LCZ 3) and compact mid-rise buildings (LCZ 2) were identified as the warmest in both cities, while bodies of water (LCZ G) and densely-forested areas (LCZ A) made up the coolest zones. ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparison tests demonstrated that significant temperature differences between the various LCZs prevail. The results of testing were similar for both study areas (89.3% and 91.7% significant LST differences for Brno and Prague, respectively). LSTs computed from LANDSAT differentiated better between LCZs, compared with ASTER. LCZ 8 (large low-rise buildings), LCZ 10 (heavy industry) and LCZ D (low plants) are well-differentiated zones in terms of their surface temperatures. In contrast, LCZ 2 (compact mid-rise), LCZ 4 (open high-rise) and LCZ 9 (sparsely built-up) are less distinguishable in both areas analyzed. Factors such as seasonality and thermal anisotropy remain a challenge for future research into LST differences.

Diversification of Land Surface Temperature Change under Urban Landscape Renewal: A Case Study in the Main City of Shenzhen, China

“…Although there is no doubt that the form and expansion of urban landscape directly increases the threats of UHIs, the quantitative spatiotemporal variations of land surface temperature (LST) under urban landscape transformation are diverse [3][4][5][6]. This diversification could be caused by differences in seasons, hours, climate zones, and urbanization types [7][8][9][10]. Thus, the relationship between landscape pattern and LST is not consistent among various research conditions.…”

“…Depending on the blackbody radiation, LST can be converted according to the sensor scaling constant [33], as shown in Equation (9). In Landsat 5, 7, and 8, the constant K 1 is …”

Assessing the Effects of Urban Morphology Parameters on Microclimate in Singapore to Control the Urban Heat Island Effect

“…Numerous parameters are available to assess and quantify the effects of urban environment characteristics on air temperature [25][26][27][28]. However, the Singapore island temperature pattern shows urban heat island characteristics based on the conditions of surrounding buildings, greenery, and pavement [29].…”

Impact of Urban Climate Landscape Patterns on Land Surface Temperature in Wuhan, China

“…The LCZ classification distinguishes built environments more finely than other similar classification schemes such as local thermal zone (LTZ) classification [24]. In further studies based on the LCZ scheme, different methods of classification and various data sources are considered in order to achieve better classification results [25,26]. Some researchers focus on the classification results and their accuracy [27][28][29].…”