2002
DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0046:lctcpa]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landbird Counting Techniques: Current Practices and an Alternative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
105
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, most annual variations (e.g., weather) can be expected to play on several species and would then be tampered in the computation of frequency. Another bias may have been generated if there was a difference in species detectability between transects among fragments and point counts in the continuous landscape (Rosenstock et al 2002). To eliminate such possibility, we sampled 67 transects in the open landscape in 2007, to compare the differences in species abundances between the two methods.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, most annual variations (e.g., weather) can be expected to play on several species and would then be tampered in the computation of frequency. Another bias may have been generated if there was a difference in species detectability between transects among fragments and point counts in the continuous landscape (Rosenstock et al 2002). To eliminate such possibility, we sampled 67 transects in the open landscape in 2007, to compare the differences in species abundances between the two methods.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is common practice to ignore detection probability (e.g. Rosenstock et al 2002;EuMon consortium 2006;Henry and Jarne 2007). This practice may be reasonable if a pre-analysis showed that detection probability can be considered constant trough space and time, or that variation is random and cannot generate spurious trends.…”
Section: Accounting For Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point count method (Blondel et al 1970;Bibby et al 2000) is one of the most widely used methods for taking censuses of bird populations (Rosenstock et al 2002;Simons et al 2009). A point count is defined as a period of time during which an observer records the auditory and visual signals of the individuals on predetermined sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to resolve this problem, in part, standardized methods are generally used to perform point counts (Rosenstock et al 2002): low wind levels and rainfall, calibration of observers, and surveys carried out early in the morning when the birds' singing activity is at its most intense. The environmental conditions at the time of point counts are therefore quite similar from one study to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%