Landeskultur und Landesinnovation

Rossberger, Robert J.; Krause, Diana E.

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-02551-9_17

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At present, only a minority of researchers use the cultural dimensions of the GLOBE study to investigate cultural impacts on national innovativeness, among them, Taylor and Wilson (2012) and Rossberger and Krause (2012, 2013). In their research, Taylor and Wilson (2012) focus on the relationship of individualism and collectivism to innovation.…”

Section: Culture and Cultural Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rossberger and Krause (2012, 2013) examine the correlation between the cultural dimensions of the GLOBE study (House et al, 2004) and different innovation indices, among them, the Global Innovation Index (GII) for the years 2009, 2010, and 2011. They find significantly positive relations to Uncertainty Avoidance (practice), Institutional Collectivism (practice), Gender Egalitarianism (value), Future Orientation (practice), Humane Orientation (value), and Performance Orientation (practice).…”

Section: Culture and Cultural Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal

Deckert

Schomaker

2018

Cross-Cultural Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

National innovativeness is one key driver of economic development. The relation of national innovativeness and national culture has been firmly established by research. Cultural factors, however, influence national innovativeness via different mechanisms on the macro-, meso-, and micro-level of a country. In our article, we build on existing research on the link between cultural dimensions and national innovativeness to develop a new model that classifies different cultural dimensions in groups according to their mechanism: political, social, or individual (PSI-model). Using a newly established data set composed of world data, we test and find support for this model using a variety of regression models. The PSI-model provides a more structured theoretical background of the impact of different cultural dimensions on national innovativeness, especially with regard to social practices and social values. It can be used to generate policy recommendations on national innovativeness and offers further applications in fields related to the various impacts of national culture.

show abstract

Section: Culture and Cultural Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Culture and Cultural Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal

Deckert

Schomaker

2018

Cross-Cultural Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, previous research has shown that it is characteristic for low innovation countries to exhibit a tendency to lower institutional collectivism, future orientation, performance orientation, and uncertainty avoidance, and higher in-group collectivism (Rossberger & Krause, 2013).…”

Section: Leadership Cultural Practices and Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The GLOBE "as is" practice dimensions reflect these cultural practices; therefore, a relationship between culturally endorsed leadership dimensions and cultural practices is likely. Previous research on the relationship between national culture and innovation has shown that particularly the GLOBE cultural practice dimensions future orientation, in-group collectivism, institutional collectivism, performance orientation, and uncertainty avoidance are linked to the national level of innovation (Rossberger & Krause, 2013).…”

Section: Leadership Cultural Practices and Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participative and Team-Oriented Leadership Styles, Countries’ Education Level, and National Innovation

Rossberger

Krause

2014

Cross-Cultural Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aims to provide insights into the leadership–innovation relationship on the national level by considering national-level contingency factors. We argue that the impact of a prevailing leadership style on innovation is mediated by economic and political factors and innovation-related cultural practices. Moreover, it is argued that the educational level of a country is related to the prevailing leadership style and economic factors. We propose a model and test its explanatory power with a sample of 55 countries using variance-based structural equation modeling. The results show that the prevailing leadership style has no direct relationship with national innovation but is mediated by the abovementioned factors. The results also show that the level of education within a country is positively related to participative leadership and negatively to team-oriented leadership. Furthermore, the level of education is directly related to economic and political factors and indirectly to national innovation.

show abstract

“…Cultural practices act as informal institutions [30], which regulate and often constrain human interactions [31,32] and represent observable manifestations of the national cultural environment. Empirically, the GLOBE national cultural practice dimensions of future orientation (positive relationship), institutional collectivism (positive relationship), in-group collectivism (negative relationship), performance orientation (positive relationship), and uncertainty avoidance (positive relationship) are significantly related to innovation at the national level [33].…”

Section: Culture and Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality, Culture and Innovation

Rossberger¹,

Krause²

2014

GSTF J Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-This study investigates the relationship between personality factors, cultural practices, and innovativeness at the national level. It is shown that the relationship between the nationally aggregated personality factors of openness to experience and agreeableness and national innovation is mediated by the national cultural practice dimensions of future orientation, institutional collectivism, in-group collectivism, performance orientation, and uncertainty avoidance.

show abstract

Landeskultur und Landesinnovation

Cited by 5 publications

References 24 publications

Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal

Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal

Participative and Team-Oriented Leadership Styles, Countries’ Education Level, and National Innovation

Personality, Culture and Innovation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About