2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-022-10636-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape ecological risk assessment of Yulin Region in Shaanxi Province of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By calculating the ecological risk values for each risk area in various years and assigning them to the central points of each risk area, Kriging interpolation was applied to the central point data. Following the method of natural break classification, the landscape ecological risk results were categorized into five levels [39][40][41]: low (ERI < 0.1373), lower (0.1373 < ERI < 0.1595), medium (0.1595 < ERI < 0.1726), higher (0.1726 < ERI < 0.1850), and high (ERI > 0.1850). The ecological risk classification for other years was based on the classification intervals established in the year 2000 for ease of later data comparisons.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Changes In Landscape Pattern Ecological Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By calculating the ecological risk values for each risk area in various years and assigning them to the central points of each risk area, Kriging interpolation was applied to the central point data. Following the method of natural break classification, the landscape ecological risk results were categorized into five levels [39][40][41]: low (ERI < 0.1373), lower (0.1373 < ERI < 0.1595), medium (0.1595 < ERI < 0.1726), higher (0.1726 < ERI < 0.1850), and high (ERI > 0.1850). The ecological risk classification for other years was based on the classification intervals established in the year 2000 for ease of later data comparisons.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Changes In Landscape Pattern Ecological Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%