2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0889-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape of RAS pathway mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes: a study of 461 molecularly annotated patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Myeloproliferative features were present in 4/10 patients, with: MDS/MPN-U with prominent eosinophilia in patient 6, megacaryocytic hyperplasia with fibrosis in patients 8 and 10, and MP-CMML in patient 11. The presence of myeloproliferative features in these four patients could be accounted for by genetics only in patient 6, who carried multiple RAS-pathway mutations [ 15 ], and in patient 11, who showed a typical mutational signature of proliferative CMML, with a classical combination of epigenetically targeted and Ras-pathway gene mutations [ 16 ]. The genetic lesion causing the eosinophilia of patient 6 was not evident, having ruled out, by FISH, the fusion transcripts of PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, and band 8p11, as well as the PCM1-JAK2 fusion, and, by NGS, the presence of JAK2exon13indel; it is noteworthy that this patient had a “second hit” in ETV6 by a missense point mutation at an allele frequency of 14%, probably abolishing completely ETV6 function in a subclone of the disease [ 6 ].…”
Section: Case Series Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myeloproliferative features were present in 4/10 patients, with: MDS/MPN-U with prominent eosinophilia in patient 6, megacaryocytic hyperplasia with fibrosis in patients 8 and 10, and MP-CMML in patient 11. The presence of myeloproliferative features in these four patients could be accounted for by genetics only in patient 6, who carried multiple RAS-pathway mutations [ 15 ], and in patient 11, who showed a typical mutational signature of proliferative CMML, with a classical combination of epigenetically targeted and Ras-pathway gene mutations [ 16 ]. The genetic lesion causing the eosinophilia of patient 6 was not evident, having ruled out, by FISH, the fusion transcripts of PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, and band 8p11, as well as the PCM1-JAK2 fusion, and, by NGS, the presence of JAK2exon13indel; it is noteworthy that this patient had a “second hit” in ETV6 by a missense point mutation at an allele frequency of 14%, probably abolishing completely ETV6 function in a subclone of the disease [ 6 ].…”
Section: Case Series Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPN component subsequently develops with the acquisition of signaling mutations, most commonly JAK2 V617F (50%), with MPL and SH2B3 mutations being infrequent (<10%) 102 . Of note, RAS pathway mutations and CALR mutations are very uncommon in MDS/MPN‐RS‐T 103 …”
Section: Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative Neoplasm With Ring Sideroblasts and Thrombocytosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPN component subsequently develops with the acquisition of signaling mutations, most commonly JAK2 V617F (50%), with MPL and SH2B3 mutations being infrequent (<10%) 102. Of note, RAS pathway mutations and CALR mutations are very uncommon in MDS/MPN-RS-T 103. 4 | CONCLUSIONMDS-RS and MDS/MPN-RS-T are myeloid neoplasms synonymous with the presence of BM RS and the presence of SF3B1 mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in genes belonging to the RAS signaling pathway, including NRAS, KRAS, and CBL, are also relatively common in CMML. RAS-related gene mutations are more closely related to the proliferative phenotype of CMML and have been reported to have a negative impact on prognosis [12,30,[42][43][44][45]. However, this poor prognostic impact of RAS pathway alterations does not rule out the possibility that the proliferative phenotype of the mutant group and concomitant mutation in high-risk genes such as ASXL1 are affected.…”
Section: Genetic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%