2013
DOI: 10.1179/1743277412y.0000000027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape Preference and Map Readability in Design Evaluation of Topographic Maps with an Orthoimage Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For each group, nine questions were asked based on the main landscape features in the area (Table 3) The effectiveness and efficiency of the image maps were evaluated according to the ISO 9241-11 standard, wherein effectiveness is defined as the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals, and efficiency as the resources used in relation to the results achieved; such resources include time, human effort, money, and materials (ISO, 2018). These criteria are widely used in map evaluation (Harrie & Stigmar, 2010;Leung & Li, 2002;Liao et al, 2018;Raposo & Brewer, 2014;Schnur, Bektaş, & Çöltekin, 2018;Stigmar & Harrie, 2011).…”
Section: Image-map Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For each group, nine questions were asked based on the main landscape features in the area (Table 3) The effectiveness and efficiency of the image maps were evaluated according to the ISO 9241-11 standard, wherein effectiveness is defined as the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals, and efficiency as the resources used in relation to the results achieved; such resources include time, human effort, money, and materials (ISO, 2018). These criteria are widely used in map evaluation (Harrie & Stigmar, 2010;Leung & Li, 2002;Liao et al, 2018;Raposo & Brewer, 2014;Schnur, Bektaş, & Çöltekin, 2018;Stigmar & Harrie, 2011).…”
Section: Image-map Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second involves simplifying the background image in order to enhance the usability of image maps, for example, adjusting their transparency (Hoarau, 2012; Hoarau & Christophe, 2017), adjusting contrast and saturation (Raposo & Brewer, 2011, 2013, 2014), smoothing (Dong, Liao, Roth, & Wang, 2014), and highlighting or de‐emphasizing the image intellectually (Murphy, 2014). This study focuses on the effects of the transparency of background image on the usability of image maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, understanding how using symbolic and non-symbolic shapes in the design of a map would affect individuals’ cognitive processing of information is not established in the literature. Many previous studies have reported the single effect of map design on map reading performance (Raposo and Brewer, 2014), but is has been argued that, using the cognitive cartographic approach will create a non-representational approach to map design (Kitchin et al , 2009). This is believed to influence individuals’ ability to construct meaning from map symbols (Fernández and Buchroithner, 2014), thus resulting in different performance outcomes (Demaj and Field, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Granö's publications -also in the Germanspeaking region. The publication of "Pure Geography" (Granö & Paasi, 1997;Paasi, 1997;Golledge, 1998) (Raposo & Brewer, 2014) In this context it has, however, to be mentioned that the insights and ideas of the Finn date back to the 1920s whereas the publications of the others about the mentioned features stem from times half a century later.…”
Section: Titelmentioning
confidence: 99%