2021
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide age, elevation and residual vegetation determine tropical montane forest canopy recovery and biomass accumulation after landslide disturbances in the Peruvian Andes

Abstract: Landslides are common natural disturbances in tropical montane forests. While the geomorphic drivers of landslides in the Andes have been studied, factors controlling post‐landslide forest recovery across the steep climatic and topographic gradients characteristic of tropical mountains are poorly understood. Here we use a LiDAR‐derived canopy height map coupled with a 25‐year landslide time‐series map to examine how landslide, topographic and biophysical factors, along with residual vegetation, affect canopy h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, some studies opt to derive recovery indices from spectral vegetation indices. Recovery indices can be computed from both active and passive sensors and measure the time needed for a pixel to reach its pre‐disturbance greenness (João et al, 2018) or biomass (Freund et al, 2021; Nicolau et al, 2021), or the greenness or biomass of reference sites (Storey et al, 2016) following a disturbance. Because they integrate a baseline value (e.g., 5‐year median, average during normal years), recovery indices can account for spatio‐temporal variability in abiotic characteristics, plant composition, and their spectral properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, some studies opt to derive recovery indices from spectral vegetation indices. Recovery indices can be computed from both active and passive sensors and measure the time needed for a pixel to reach its pre‐disturbance greenness (João et al, 2018) or biomass (Freund et al, 2021; Nicolau et al, 2021), or the greenness or biomass of reference sites (Storey et al, 2016) following a disturbance. Because they integrate a baseline value (e.g., 5‐year median, average during normal years), recovery indices can account for spatio‐temporal variability in abiotic characteristics, plant composition, and their spectral properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, some studies opt to derive recovery indices from spectral vegetation indices. Recovery indices can be computed from both active and passive sensors and measure the time needed for a pixel to reach its pre-disturbance greenness (João et al, 2018) or biomass (Freund et al, 2021;Nicolau et al, 2021), or the greenness or biomass of reference sites (Storey et al, 2016)…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 m), and on steep slopes the canopy and understory are only a few metres apart and vertical stratification is greatly reduced in comparison to the well-segregated forest strata in the contiguous lowlands [ 36 ]. Furthermore, frequent landslide disturbances on steep slopes help maintain patches of early- and mid-successional vegetation on the landscape and increase the horizontal heterogeneity of habitat structure [ 36 , 84 ]. By contrast, lowland forest strata are more discrete, resulting in segregated foraging microhabitats for canopy and understory flocks that greatly increase the costs of activity matching [ 9 ] and could decrease the benefits of social information [ 85 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At disturbance legacy-rich sites, live trees can regenerate by advanced seedlings on undisturbed vegetation patches, buried seeds, or sprouts (Guariguata 1990). Freund and others (2021) also suggested that canopy heights are higher for 25 years after landslides at sites that include residual vegetation. Therefore, the accumulation rates of live tree AGB were highest (Figure 2a) in the deposition zone, followed by the transport zone and then the initiation zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%