1999
DOI: 10.1007/s100640050066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
585
0
69

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,255 publications
(654 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
585
0
69
Order By: Relevance
“…Many different types of landslide hazard zonation techniques have been developed over the last decades, and the difficulty lies in the weighting the factors [32,[56][57][58][59][60]. In this paper, the parameters were weighted as follows: the model builder was used in the ArcGIS 10.1 software and all the environmental settings were checked such as processing extent, raster analysis and cell size.…”
Section: Combining Hazard Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many different types of landslide hazard zonation techniques have been developed over the last decades, and the difficulty lies in the weighting the factors [32,[56][57][58][59][60]. In this paper, the parameters were weighted as follows: the model builder was used in the ArcGIS 10.1 software and all the environmental settings were checked such as processing extent, raster analysis and cell size.…”
Section: Combining Hazard Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the weighted overlay tool, the values of each dataset were then weighted [44,60], and all input parameters were assigned each a percentage of influence or hazard index. The higher the percentage of influence, the greater impact a particular input parameter will have on landslides or floods.…”
Section: Combining Hazard Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain expertise is therefore essential for supplementing semi-automated computational methods with meaningful semantic heuristics. Estimations are then made of their relative contribution in slope failure and areas are classified as having different hazard or susceptibility degree [3][4][5]. Multivariate statistical methods are commonly used methodologies for these analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um bom exemplo de classificação dos métodos de avaliação de susceptibilidade e de perigo a escorregamentos é a apresentada por Aleotti & Chowdhury (1999), formulada com base em classificações anteriores, como o próprio trabalho de Carrar (1983), Soeters & Van Westen (1996), entre outros.…”
Section: Mapas De Risco Potencial a Acidentes Naturaisunclassified
“…Obviamente, esta operação é facilitada com a aplicação de SIG e, em grande parte da "popularidade" desta abordagem estatística se deve ao incremento nas aplicações destas técnicas, segundo apontamento de Aleotti & Chowdhury (1999).…”
Section: Métodos Quantitativosunclassified