2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-019-01506-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility mapping: a practitioner’s view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is differential equation needs to be solved by integral, and only a few cases have analytical solutions, such as ignoring the soil's own weight, and more general cases require numerical methods. e vertical strip method and the oblique strip-mode energy method have their own characteristics, and simple discrete methods are used to solve the corresponding safety factors [20]. e vertical striping method was developed earlier, and the concept is simpler and more straightforward, but it is not as strict as the diagonal striping method from the theoretical basis.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is differential equation needs to be solved by integral, and only a few cases have analytical solutions, such as ignoring the soil's own weight, and more general cases require numerical methods. e vertical strip method and the oblique strip-mode energy method have their own characteristics, and simple discrete methods are used to solve the corresponding safety factors [20]. e vertical striping method was developed earlier, and the concept is simpler and more straightforward, but it is not as strict as the diagonal striping method from the theoretical basis.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many landslide parameters and increasingly sophisticated statistical methods have been used in landslide research over the past decades [11]. However, poor representation of actual ground conditions hampers research results to be applied in practice [12]. Daniel et al conducted a landslide susceptibility assessment with the bivariate statistical method, which reduces the number of input parameters from 13 to 6.…”
Section: Application In Disaster Risk Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the few widely accepted principles in landslide prediction is that the conditioning factors that caused past and recent landslides will likely be the ones triggering future landslides [4]. Also, according to previous studies [54][55][56], a good selection of landslide conditioning factors is one of the vital requirements to have accurate landslide susceptibility maps. Based on an analysis performed by [32], other previous works [24,52], and the availability of data in the study region, 14 conditioning factors were chosen for this study.…”
Section: Landslide Conditioning Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%