2015
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Abilities in Neanderthals

Abstract: Neanderthal language abilities cannot be directly observed, but indirect evidence is available in their anatomy, archeology, and DNA. Neanderthal anatomy shows possible speech adaptations, and their archeology contains enough indicators of behavioral modernity, including symbols and ornaments, to conclude that their minds could handle symbolic communication. Neanderthal DNA, finally, indicates both that they possessed some of the language-relevant genes found in modern humans and that they could and did have c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Villa and Roebroeks () suggest, there is little in the Neanderthal behavioural package that differs significantly from the African Middle Stone Age (associated with H. sapiens ) where we have no problem accepting a capacity for language for those populations. There have been many arguments regarding the Neanderthal capacity for language that we do not need to reiterate here (but see Johansson, for a useful review). However, recent work has suggested that there would seem to be biological support for the Neanderthal ability for speech from D'Anastasio et al .…”
Section: Updating Neanderthal Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As Villa and Roebroeks () suggest, there is little in the Neanderthal behavioural package that differs significantly from the African Middle Stone Age (associated with H. sapiens ) where we have no problem accepting a capacity for language for those populations. There have been many arguments regarding the Neanderthal capacity for language that we do not need to reiterate here (but see Johansson, for a useful review). However, recent work has suggested that there would seem to be biological support for the Neanderthal ability for speech from D'Anastasio et al .…”
Section: Updating Neanderthal Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The origin and evolution of language and speech are a heavily debated topic, a major division being between models proposing recent and sudden origin, restricted to modern humans only (Berwick & Chomsky, 2017;Hauser et al, 2014;Klein, 2009), versus deep origin, gradual evolution, and a wider distribution (also including archaic humans, such as the Neanderthals; Dediu & Levinson, 2013, 2018Johansson, 2015;Lieberman, 2016). In particular, the speech capacities of archaic humans have been linked to the position of the larynx (itself linked to the position of the hyoid bone), and the corresponding ratio between the horizontal and the vertical parts of the vocal tract (Lieberman, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, environmental changes likely impacted their access to food, and they clearly adapted in order to survive as long as they did. Along the way, Neanderthals developed complex tools (e.g., [5]), likely intentionally buried their dead (e.g., [6]), may have created cave art (e.g., [7]), very likely made ornamentation (e.g., [8]), likely used symbols and very likely had a spoken language [9], and mated with modern humans (e.g., [4]). However, despite what the dietary behaviors of our closest hominin relatives could potentially tell us about our own early history, we found no comprehensive review of the paleoethnobotany of the Neanderthal, and so we gleaned the literature for evidence of their nutritional, medicinal, and ritual uses of plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%