“…The best model I can think of for the right stance for ESP at present is dentistry: In the long run, the more successful dentists are, the less demand there will be for their services as they remove the problems they are trained to address. Likewise, if ESP practitioners succeed in enabling countries to attain their rightful places in the world through access to information (which, according to Kaplan, 1983, is stored primarily in English) and appropriate technology, those countries will eventually be in a position to assert their own native languages, and the dominance of English will gradually give way to reciprocity and fairness with, as Kaplan put it, "a balance between cultivation of indigenous culture-rich language and the need for a world language" (p. 1). It seems that we English-teaching professionals, especially ESP practitioners, can do what we can to aid the development of the world with self-reflective restraint, or we can continue to support, even unconsciously, the negative aspects of the dominance of English and suffer the consequences when English is no longer dominant.…”