The article shows how both macro-and micro-sociolinguistic perspectives are necessary to explain national language management. Macro-level language planning is motivated by tasks of national consolidation by the state, notably in Singapore's case tasks of socio-ethnic integration and economic development. Micro-level language management pertains to individuals' adjustments of language in discourse, including individual language acquisition and use in response to institutional and other changes brought about by the macro-level planning.Following a policy of pragmatic multilingualism, the state in Singapore intervenes proactively in language communication to support non-linguistic goals. This is illustrated by the language policy in education and mass communication. Further, this macro-level language management is made within a constraint of reliance on external norms, thus removing the government from the complications of evaluating particular features of discourse. This distance allows the government to keep people's attention on the longer-term goals of implementing internationally adequate English and Chinese (Mandarin) norms. Meanwhile, exoglossic norms are promoted as the gate-keeping devices for individual social mobility, while massive individual variation is tolerated among speakers.The two approaches to language management are complementary to each other. Since in Singapore relatively more has been done at the macro-level in language management, there is a need for linguists and sociolinguists, as well as language planners, to explore more microlevel issues, with a discoursal and interactional emphasis. A balanced application of the two approaches will contribute to the creation and management of Singapore's language resources and, in the long run, serve both individual growth and the objectives of nation-building. The Sociolinguistic SituationSingapore's population of approximately three million is ethnically heterogeneous, with about 77% Chinese, 15% Malay, 6% of Indian origins, and 2% of other ethnic definitions. Its language situation is richly diversified. The 1980 census lists 20 specific "dialect groups" under the above four major ethnic category labels. It is however important to note that the reference to dialect of

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract