2011
DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v6i2.1529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language and Text-to-Speech Technologies for Highly Accessible Language & Culture Learning

Abstract: Abstract-This contribution presents the results of the "Speech technology integrated learning modules for Intercultural Dialogue" project. The project objective was to increase the availability and quality of e-learning opportunities for less widely-used and less taught European languages using a user-friendly and highly accessible learning environment. The integration of new Text-to-Speech developments into web-based authoring software for tutorial CALL had a double goal: on the one hand increase the accessib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the data, both the analysis of quantitative and qualitative, finally resulted that most participants accept Catalan text-to-speech audio description as an alternative solution to the standard human-voiced audio description. However, natural voices (not the Text2Speech voice), based on the study, got statistically higher scores than synthetic voices (the Text2Speech) and are still the preferred solution (Torne & Matamala, 2015;Arbie et al, 2013;Gelan, 2011;Hasanah & Jaroji, 2016). Natural voices from humans are easier to understand (high score) than Text2Speech voices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The analysis of the data, both the analysis of quantitative and qualitative, finally resulted that most participants accept Catalan text-to-speech audio description as an alternative solution to the standard human-voiced audio description. However, natural voices (not the Text2Speech voice), based on the study, got statistically higher scores than synthetic voices (the Text2Speech) and are still the preferred solution (Torne & Matamala, 2015;Arbie et al, 2013;Gelan, 2011;Hasanah & Jaroji, 2016). Natural voices from humans are easier to understand (high score) than Text2Speech voices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The studies focused specifically on reviewing authentication methods and the level of accessibility with which they are designed, with the aim of demonstrating the challenges faced by people with dyslexia when authenticating on a website. Another particular study had as its main objective to present Text to Speech technologies to integrate into websites, and therefore, to serve as an assisted guide for people who present difficulties during reading as is the case of dyslexics (9) (10) (11) (12). Of the studies that were dedicated to presenting original software solutions to improve web accessibility for dyslexics, 60% (6 documents) belonged to browser extensions.…”
Section: Figure 3 Number Of Documents Per Publishermentioning
confidence: 99%