2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.593108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Familiarity and Proficiency Leads to Differential Cortical Processing During Translation Between Distantly Related Languages

Abstract: In the midst of globalization, English is regarded as an international language, or Lingua Franca, but learning it as a second language (L2) remains still difficult to speakers of other languages. This is true especially for the speakers of languages distantly related to English such as Japanese. In this sense, exploring neural basis for translation between the first language (L1) and L2 is of great interest. There have been relatively many previous researches revealing brain activation patterns during transla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(156 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decreased BA was observed in familiar stimuli letters compared with unfamiliar stimuli [30]. Another study revealed that a group of advanced learners of English showed greater activation in the left PFC while working on low-frequency word translation tasks but no activation with high-familiarity words [42,32]. In addition, greater involvement of the DLPFC in reading by advanced L2 learners has been reported [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decreased BA was observed in familiar stimuli letters compared with unfamiliar stimuli [30]. Another study revealed that a group of advanced learners of English showed greater activation in the left PFC while working on low-frequency word translation tasks but no activation with high-familiarity words [42,32]. In addition, greater involvement of the DLPFC in reading by advanced L2 learners has been reported [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In novice L2 learners' lexical processing, increased activity in the DLPFC has been reported [28], and L2 and L1 are considered to be processed in a language network that includes the DLPFC [29,30]. In L2 acquisition studies, decreased BA was observed in familiar letters compared with unfamiliar ones [31] ; more advanced learners of English showed less activation of the brain than elementary learners; the advanced group showed less activation in processing familiar words than in processing unfamiliar words [32]. These ndings suggest that the higher the pro ciency gain, the lesser the energy needed for language processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, and even beyond its theoretical limitations, such an approach is scarcely useful when attempting to understand how language distance affects cognitive aspects of language processing in multilinguals. Conversely, the problem has been dealt with repeatedly in neuroscience and psycholinguistics (Vaid, 1983;Gleitman, 1985;Odlin, 1989;Cenoz et al, 2001;Koda, 2005;Bassetti, 2008;Kim et al, 2016;Schepens et al, 2016;Zawiszewski and Laka, 2020;Shinozuka et al, 2021). Models of multilingual processing have tried to define how the cognitive system manages shared and distinctive features between languages.…”
Section: Language Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesion studies have reported the cortical representation of both Chinese and English processing in Broca’s area, the premotor cortex, Wernicke’s area, as well the parietotemporal boundary [ 23 ]. Moreover, neuroimaging studies regarding translation or interpreting, have identified significant activation in inferior and dorsolateral frontal region [ 8 , 14 , 17 , 23 ], prefrontal regions [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 24 , 25 ], Broca’s area [ 25 , 26 , 27 ], as well as the left temporal area [ 14 , 18 , 28 ] during the task, suggesting the above-mentioned cortical regions are of paramount importance in the cognitive processing of interlingual brokering. These areas were our focus for neural imaging observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%