2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language laterality determined by MEG mapping with MR-FOCUSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have demonstrated a high concordance (approximately 90%) between MEG language lateralization and the IAP (69,(91)(92)(93)(94). Other investigators have used silent verb generation and picture naming tasks with comparable results (95,96). Most studies have used equivalent current dipoles (ECD) to determine language lateralization by modeling the distribution of activity every several milliseconds separately in each hemisphere.…”
Section: Megmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These studies have demonstrated a high concordance (approximately 90%) between MEG language lateralization and the IAP (69,(91)(92)(93)(94). Other investigators have used silent verb generation and picture naming tasks with comparable results (95,96). Most studies have used equivalent current dipoles (ECD) to determine language lateralization by modeling the distribution of activity every several milliseconds separately in each hemisphere.…”
Section: Megmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when cognitive processes are distributed in nature (which is likely characteristic of language), ECDs may underestimate the regions involved. To overcome this limitation, distributed source solutions have been developed and studied in patients with epilepsy (95) and healthy controls (98-100). In particular, Bowyer et al (95) studied language lateralization in patients with epilepsy using a current density technique (MR-FOCUSS) that estimates the strength of cortical activation between hemispheres.…”
Section: Megmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the most promising novel noninvasive methods include direct measures of physiological language activation. Some newer methods include event-related brain potentials [4] and whole-head magnetoencephalography [5][6][7]. The other alternative activation techniques are based on hemodynamic responses to language activation, such as functional transcranial Doppler [8], single-photon-emission computed tomography [9], positron emission tomography [10], near-infrared spectroscopic mapping [11], and functional magnetic resonance imaging [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language lateralization can be determined by means of MEG using various language paradigms such as word recognition tasks, 54 silent reading, 26 picture naming, and verb generation. 7 An 89-95% concordance rate has been found between MEG language mapping and results from Wada testing. 53 Magnetoencephalographic language studies in patients with chronic seizure disorders of left hemispheric onset have demonstrated atypical language organization.…”
Section: Functional Mappingmentioning
confidence: 93%