2004
DOI: 10.1515/semi.2004.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language, meaning, modernity, and doowop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of all the residents of the reservation, the editors chose the profile of Francis Uplegger, the Lutheran missionary, as the lead article for the issue. 4 I have discussed elsewhere some of the ideological effects of this process in modernizing Europe and the United States (Samuels 2004a), arguing that rationalizing ideologies marginalize such practices as vocables and scat singing in favor of the rational, if arbitrary, practices of referentiality. See the references therein; also Urban 2001, Certeau 1996.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N : R a T I O N A L I Z A T I O N A N D R mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all the residents of the reservation, the editors chose the profile of Francis Uplegger, the Lutheran missionary, as the lead article for the issue. 4 I have discussed elsewhere some of the ideological effects of this process in modernizing Europe and the United States (Samuels 2004a), arguing that rationalizing ideologies marginalize such practices as vocables and scat singing in favor of the rational, if arbitrary, practices of referentiality. See the references therein; also Urban 2001, Certeau 1996.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N : R a T I O N A L I Z A T I O N A N D R mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or they can use the discourse of unintelligibility 'as ways to back-talk' (Samuels 2004: 300) Indonesian hegemonic ideologies of semantic transparency and grammatical rationality. Or they can use the discourse of unintelligibility 'as ways to back-talk' (Samuels 2004: 300) Indonesian hegemonic ideologies of semantic transparency and grammatical rationality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But to bring up punning in a discussion of linguistic relativities might seem too much! Such a view is conditioned, as our modernist conceits so well described by Bauman and Briggs (2003) and Samuels (2004b) suggests, on the low standing of puns in the serious work of language. But punning is, after all, and to borrow the term from Samuels (2001), a form of phonological iconicity.…”
Section: In Favor Of Soundmentioning
confidence: 94%