International Encyclopedia of the Social &Amp; Behavioral Sciences 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.54033-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Processing, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
(326 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DLPFC is mainly responsible for working memory (Crottaz-Herbette et al, 2004;Grimault et al, 2009), and its activation level has been considered as a neural marker of lower AP skills (Ross et al, 2004;Wilson et al, 2009;Zatorre et al, 1994) because the less expert musicians seem to adopt a pitch working memory strategy to keep the tones "in mind." Some of the regions that had significant RSFC with the DLPFC in the current study have also been found to be related to working memory (for example, fusiform gyrus, see Schmithorst & Holland, 2004;Wu et al, 2017; putamen, see Wu et al, 2017; superior frontal gyrus, see du Boisgueheneuc et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2017;Yoon et al, 2016; precentral gyrus, see Bunge et al, 2001;Hautzel et al, 2002;Yang & Small, 2015).…”
Section: Musical Training and Dynamic Rsfcsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DLPFC is mainly responsible for working memory (Crottaz-Herbette et al, 2004;Grimault et al, 2009), and its activation level has been considered as a neural marker of lower AP skills (Ross et al, 2004;Wilson et al, 2009;Zatorre et al, 1994) because the less expert musicians seem to adopt a pitch working memory strategy to keep the tones "in mind." Some of the regions that had significant RSFC with the DLPFC in the current study have also been found to be related to working memory (for example, fusiform gyrus, see Schmithorst & Holland, 2004;Wu et al, 2017; putamen, see Wu et al, 2017; superior frontal gyrus, see du Boisgueheneuc et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2017;Yoon et al, 2016; precentral gyrus, see Bunge et al, 2001;Hautzel et al, 2002;Yang & Small, 2015).…”
Section: Musical Training and Dynamic Rsfcsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Some of the regions are also responsible for language processing, which has been found to be improved by musical training. For example, musical training can improve phonological and semantic processing subserved by the superior temporal gyrus (Lai et al, 2015), or phonological processing subserved by the inferior parietal lobule (Bermudez et al, 2009; Bermudez & Zatorre, 2005; Lai et al, 2015) or the precentral gyrus (Bunge et al, 2001; Hautzel et al, 2002; Yang & Small, 2015). Consistently, phonological and semantic strategies have been found to benefit PI processing (Hsieh & Saberi, 2008; Wilson et al, 2009; Zatorre & Beckett, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left IFG participates in phonological and semantic processing [ 79 ]. As a key component of the ventral stream that processes speech signals for comprehension, the left middle temporal gyrus plays an important role in phonological–semantic mapping and semantic information retrieval [ 62 , 80 , 81 , 82 ]. In addition, as a structure containing the human primary auditory cortex, the right HES is related to the processing of phonological information [ 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of middle temporal structures in processing sounds and sound structure is well established (Yang & Small, 2015). The dual-stream model of speech processing identifies the middle temporal gyrus as a key component of the ventral stream (e.g., Hickok & Poeppel, 2004.…”
Section: Phonological Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%