2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41312-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Recognition Power and Succinctness of Affine Automata

Abstract: In this work we study a non-linear generalization based on affine transformations of probabilistic and quantum automata proposed recently by Díaz-Caro and Yakaryılmaz [6] referred as affine automata. First, we present efficient simulations of probabilistic and quantum automata by means of affine automata which allows us to characterize the class of exclusive stochastic languages. Then, we initiate a study on the succintness of affine automata. In particular, we show that an infinite family of unary regular lan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, A. Díaz-Caro and A. Yakaryılmaz introduced a new model, called affine automata [4], also investigated in [13] and [3]. It is a purely theoretical model, which means that it cannot be implemented by a physical device like quantum automata.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, A. Díaz-Caro and A. Yakaryılmaz introduced a new model, called affine automata [4], also investigated in [13] and [3]. It is a purely theoretical model, which means that it cannot be implemented by a physical device like quantum automata.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, bounded-error AfAs can recognize some nonregular languages such as UPAL = {a n b n | n > 0} and PAL = {w ∈ {a, b} * | w = w r } [7]. Moreover, AfAs can be very succinct compared to PFAs and QFAs [28,29], i.e., they can recognize a family of regular languages with bounded-error by using only two states, but the number of states of bounded-error PFAs or QFAs cannot be bounded for this family.…”
Section: The Computational Power Of Afas Compared To Pfas and Qfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AfAs was formally defined in [7], and it was shown that they are more powerful than PFAs and quantum finite automata (QFAs) in bounded-error and unbounded-error settings, but their nondeterministic version is equivalent to nondeterministic QFAs. Since then, AfAs and their different generalizations (e.g., OBDDs and using counters) have been investigated in a series of work [28,14,22,17,29,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AfAs and their certain generalizations have been investigated in a series of works [5,8,9,21]. In most of the cases, affine models (e.g., bounded-error and unbouded-error AfAs, zero-error affine OBDDs, zero-error affine counter automata, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%