1988
DOI: 10.1093/applin/9.1.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Carter and McCarthy (1995) add that even though subject and verb ellipsis is highly prevalent in the Nottingham corpus data the topic is treated as 'being of minor or secondary importance' in many standard grammar books (p.209). Williams (1988) criticizes textbook representations of business meetings and makes observations similar to McCarthy and Carter (1995) concerning the absence of 'authentic' spoken grammar. She notes that most of the spoken text collected, contained 'unfinished sentences, false starts, overlapping utterances, interruptions and fillers such as like, kinda, right, and you know.…”
Section: Role Of Text Books In Relation To 'Authenticity Gap'mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Carter and McCarthy (1995) add that even though subject and verb ellipsis is highly prevalent in the Nottingham corpus data the topic is treated as 'being of minor or secondary importance' in many standard grammar books (p.209). Williams (1988) criticizes textbook representations of business meetings and makes observations similar to McCarthy and Carter (1995) concerning the absence of 'authentic' spoken grammar. She notes that most of the spoken text collected, contained 'unfinished sentences, false starts, overlapping utterances, interruptions and fillers such as like, kinda, right, and you know.…”
Section: Role Of Text Books In Relation To 'Authenticity Gap'mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Yet what is reasonable, imaginable, and unsurprising may not be the real situation. For example, Williams (1988) and Nelson (2000) have both drawn attention to the gulf between the prescribed language in textbooks and the language used in authentic business interaction. This, therefore, constitutes a strong argument for the use of naturally-occurring talk as the starting place for any analysis of 'what is going on' and for the provision of datadriven, and thus credible, advice to practitioners.…”
Section: Facilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to input for the development of pragmatics, several scholars have indicated that non-target like pragmatics can be overcome by improving input. However, the nature of the input whether authentic or representative language, lies in the domain of classroom instruction (Williams, 1988;Scotton and Bernstein, 1989;Bouton, 1996;Kasper, 1997). One difficulty lies in the use or nonuse of certain speech acts with respect to a cultural preference (Bardovi-Harlig, 2001), therefore, having either a positive or negative bearing on its inclusion in the input offered in Second or Foreign Language Contexts.…”
Section: Pragmatics Input In Sl Learning and Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%