2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00258.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Teachers’ Philosophies of Teaching: Bases for Development and Possible Lines of Investigation

Abstract: The area of philosophy of education provides resources for language teachers’ development of personal philosophies of teaching. The article reviews the need for such entities and discusses the conceptual resources available for their development as well as related research in applied linguistics. Although the field of teacher cognition is identified as a close neighbor of the area, the small amount of relevant empirical research available suggests that little is known about how language teachers develop philos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants' perceptions of their future roles as teachers "implies the need for a teacher's active involvement: both professional and personal, creativity and responsibility and also the courage to be different and the need to go on trying, irrespective of failures and obstacles" (48). Burns, Edwards, and Freeman (2015) summarized the main ontological approaches used from 1990 to 2014 by a group of studies (Crookes, 2010;Freeman & Johnson, 1996;Kubanyiova, 2012) and their goal to understand the mind of the language teacher. The bulk of this research highlights the importance of understanding the pre-service teachers' values, beliefs, and histories as learners if teacher programs want to be effective in their goal to not only shape but also to transform teachers' practices.…”
Section: Literature Review Language Teacher Cognitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants' perceptions of their future roles as teachers "implies the need for a teacher's active involvement: both professional and personal, creativity and responsibility and also the courage to be different and the need to go on trying, irrespective of failures and obstacles" (48). Burns, Edwards, and Freeman (2015) summarized the main ontological approaches used from 1990 to 2014 by a group of studies (Crookes, 2010;Freeman & Johnson, 1996;Kubanyiova, 2012) and their goal to understand the mind of the language teacher. The bulk of this research highlights the importance of understanding the pre-service teachers' values, beliefs, and histories as learners if teacher programs want to be effective in their goal to not only shape but also to transform teachers' practices.…”
Section: Literature Review Language Teacher Cognitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, teachers not only acted but also reflected on their actions. This individual ontology was, however, problematised when studies began to reveal that one's cognitive capacity develops in constant interactions between the individuals and their sociocultural context (Burns & Richards, 2009;Crookes, 2010;Golombek, 1998;Kubanyiova, 2006Kubanyiova, , 2012Yuan & Lee, 2014). Further developments led to a sociohistorical ontology based on the premise that teaching occurs as a social activity that responds to the demands of a given historical moment and involves both doing and thinking (Breen et al, 2001;Feryok, 2012;Golombek & Johnson, 2004;Golombek & Doran, 2014;Johnson & Golombek, 2011;Tsui, 2007Tsui, , 2003.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past debates in our field suggest that the question of values, moral visions, ideologies, and ethical judgment is inherent in virtually every aspect of language teaching and language teacher education, whether such debates have been informed by a critical theoretical stance (e.g., Crookes, , , , ; Gray, ; Hafernik, Messerschmitt, & Vandrick, ; Hawkins, ; Johnston, ; Wong & Canagarajah, ) or whether they spring from empirical inquiry into the teachers’ internal resources which shape and are shaped by their language teaching activity in the classrooms and schools (Golombek, ; Kubanyiova, , , ; Mori, ; Scarino, ). A political or moral stance may be required in relation to the kinds of language practices that are promoted, tolerated, or discouraged in classrooms, schools, and beyond (Faltis, ; Razfar, ; Varghese, ) or to the conduct of interpersonal interactions between people in the classrooms (Burnett, ; Richards, ; Ushioda, ).…”
Section: New Challenges Perennial Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%