Magnetism: Molecules to Materials 2004
DOI: 10.1002/9783527620548.ch5d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanthanide Ions in Molecular Exchange Coupled Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contribution to the magnetic behavior in the higher temperature domain is intrinsic to Ln ions. [70] For both compounds, the c M T values at room temperature are in good agreement with contributions expected for one Ln III ion and one PTMTC 3À radical with a spin ground state of S = 1/2 (c M (1)T = 0.49 and c M (2)T = 1.58 cm 3 K mol…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This contribution to the magnetic behavior in the higher temperature domain is intrinsic to Ln ions. [70] For both compounds, the c M T values at room temperature are in good agreement with contributions expected for one Ln III ion and one PTMTC 3À radical with a spin ground state of S = 1/2 (c M (1)T = 0.49 and c M (2)T = 1.58 cm 3 K mol…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, upon cooling, a decrease in the Dc M Ln T value would indicate {Ln-radical} antiferromagnetic interactions, whereas an increase is anticipated for a ferromagnetic interaction. [38,39,43,44,70] To further confirm the nature of these interactions, the field dependence of the magnetization for compounds x and x' was also measured at 2 K. For each Ln III ion, the magnetization of radical-containing coordination polymers were compared with the theoreti- cal magnetization for the corresponding uncorrelated spin systems. [74] Results obtained by using this approach are illustrated in Figures 9 and 10 for the Sm coordination polymers (x = 1 and x' = 1').…”
Section: àmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slight decrease of the c M T product between 300 and 41.8 K is owed to the depopulation of the Stark levels of the dysprosiumA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (III). [17] The increase of c M T below 40 K is associated with an intranode ferromagnetic interaction between Cu II and Dy III , as observed with other compounds containing these two ions. [5r, 18] The field dependence of the magnetization recorded at 2 K for 2 (Figure 2, bottom) exhibits a sigmoid shape and remains below the anticipated saturation value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…At 2 K, a value of 8.43 cm 3 K mol À1 is observed for this compound. In the case of 2 (Figure 7, middle), the c M (2)T values remain close to 8.40 cm 3 K mol À1 between 300 and 10 K, and then diminish slightly to reach a value of 7.03 cm 3 K mol À1 at 2 K. For 3, the c M (3)T curve is characterized by a continuous decrease as the temperature is lowered, with a sharper decrease below 10 K to afford a c M (3)T value of 0.25 cm 3 K mol À1 at 2 K. These magnetic behaviors can be ascribed to a combination of the intrinsic characteristics of Ln ions, [53] and to potential {Ln-Ln}, {Ln-radical} and/or {radical-radical} interactions. For Eu III ions, excited states resulting from spinorbit coupling are close enough to the ground state to be thermally populated at room temperature.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%