Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection revisited: are there any health–related benefits? A comparative study

Abstract

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection confers definite health-related benefits the over open approach in terms of reduced septic complications and fewer requirements for blood transfusion. It should be considered the procedure of choice for patients with low rectal or anal canal tumour in whom sphincter excision proved inevitable.

Feasibility of laparoscopic abdomino - perineal resection for large - sized anorectal cancers : A single - institution experience of 59 cases

“…[13][14][15][16] Similarly, our conversion rate of 9.4% is comparable to most studies (10%-21%). [14][15][16] The above data clearly reflect the technical feasibility of laparoscopy for very low rectal cancers in our setting. The factor that we wish to highlight, though, is not the technical feasibility but the oncological safety.…”

“…[6,[11][12][13] Our operating time (255 minutes), as well as average duration of hospital stay (10 days), is also comparable to other similar studies. [4,6,[12][13][14][15] Our morbidity rate of 9.4% is better than the reported morbidity rates following laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancers in other series. [13][14][15][16] Similarly, our conversion rate of 9.4% is comparable to most studies (10%-21%).…”

“…[4,6,[12][13][14][15] Our morbidity rate of 9.4% is better than the reported morbidity rates following laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancers in other series. [13][14][15][16] Similarly, our conversion rate of 9.4% is comparable to most studies (10%-21%). [14][15][16] The above data clearly reflect the technical feasibility of laparoscopy for very low rectal cancers in our setting.…”

Obesity and its Therapy: A Short Review

“…These information were acquired from medicinal graphs, operation records and pathology reports. Pathologic discoveries were in view of the sixth TNM grouping [13]. The middle subsequent period was 43 months (go 3-109 months).…”

“…Our discoveries lead us to presume that it is not prescribed to perform Operation as it has not demonstrated to reduction tolerant intricacies. Unexpectedly, it builds agent time under anesthesia which conveys its own particular dangers for the patient and in addition expands the general expense to the healing facility [13]. No adjustment in entanglement rates was seen in patients with a simultaneous hiatal hernia repair.…”