Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors

Sanni, Aliu; Rix, D.; Soomro, Naeem

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006124

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Con respecto a los tiempos de isquemia podemos mencionar que la isquemia caliente históricamente ha sido mayor en la técnica laparoscópica, que en la técnica abierta [8][9][10] . A pesar de lo anterior, tiempos menores a 17 min no se relacionan con efectos deletéreos en la función renal del receptor 8,9 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…A pesar de lo anterior, tiempos menores a 17 min no se relacionan con efectos deletéreos en la función renal del receptor 8,9 . En este aspecto y, a pesar de que esta debiera intentar ser mínima, el promedio de isquemia caliente de nuestra serie es menor al tope máximo seguro.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…En nuestra serie se observa una tasa similar (8%), sin presencia de lesiones intestinales, pleurales, esplénicas, hepáti-cas, diafragmáticas o ureterales observadas en otros grupos de trabajo [8][9][10] . El caso asociado a gran morbilidad consistió en un desplazamiento de hemolock, que provocó una hemorragia masiva al primer día post-operatorio.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Nefrectomía Laparoscópica De Donante Vivo: Experiencia De 75 Casos Consecutivos

et al. 2015

Rev Chil Cir

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

live donor laparoscopic nephrectomy. experience in 75 casesBackground: Live Donor Laparoscopic nephrectomy (LDLn) has substantial benefits when compared with open nephrectomy such as shorter hospital stay, prompt return to work, less post-operative pain, better cosmetic results, less blood loss and less surgical wound infections. It is the mode of choice for safely harvesting a kidney for organ transplantation. aim: To describe the surgical results of LDLn in a pioneer renal transplant center in Chile. material and methods: Review of clinical records of 75 subjects aged 27 to 60 years (37 males) subjected to a LDLn in a public hospital between 1998 and 2013. Information about clinical and surgical data and perioperative complications was retrieved. results: no subject died. All kidneys were satisfactorily implanted in their receptors. The mean operative time was 116 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.6 days, warm ischemia time was 6.8 minutes, and cold ischemia time was 31.5 minutes. Operative adverse events occurred in 8%. The conversion and reoperation rates were 4 and 1.3%, respectively. Among receptors, 1.5% evolved with Acute Tubular necrosis and 2.2% required graft excision. conclusions: LDLn is a safe and pioneering surgical technique in Chile. Its results are satisfactory and comparable to those obtained with classic lumbotomy.

show abstract