1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01384669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-angle elastic scattering of 59.54keV photons by Kr and Xe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several experiments have been carried out to measure the * yangke@sinap.ac.cn † lfzhu@ustc.edu.cn differential cross section of x-ray elastic scattering of noble gases [5][6][7], the detectors used in these works, i.e., the intrinsic Ge planar detector [5,6] and the scintillation counter [7], have an energy resolution of only about several hundred eV, which may resolve the elastic scattering and the Compton scattering at large scattering angles, but they cannot resolve the elastic scattering and inelastic excitations because the excitation energy of the valence shell transition of atoms and molecules is less than 25 eV, which is much less than the energy resolution of these detectors. Furthermore, the ionization continuum also contributes to the elastic scattering in these experiments due to the same reason.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several experiments have been carried out to measure the * yangke@sinap.ac.cn † lfzhu@ustc.edu.cn differential cross section of x-ray elastic scattering of noble gases [5][6][7], the detectors used in these works, i.e., the intrinsic Ge planar detector [5,6] and the scintillation counter [7], have an energy resolution of only about several hundred eV, which may resolve the elastic scattering and the Compton scattering at large scattering angles, but they cannot resolve the elastic scattering and inelastic excitations because the excitation energy of the valence shell transition of atoms and molecules is less than 25 eV, which is much less than the energy resolution of these detectors. Furthermore, the ionization continuum also contributes to the elastic scattering in these experiments due to the same reason.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the nonrelativistic [12] and relativistic [13] nonlocal FF and ISF of Hubbell et al Beyond the IPA, some results for FF and ISF exist [14][15][16]. Other corrections include the anomalous scattering factor (ASF) for Rayleigh scattering and the coherent nuclear Thomson (NT) amplitude.Very few experiments have been reported for scattering from free atoms [17][18][19][20], the case for which cross sections are usually calculated. In view of the basic need for accurate and absolute measurements in free atoms to assess the importance of various approximations, we have explored scattering from neon at 90 ± in the 11 to 22 keV range where sizable differences (up to 16%) between the S-matrix and nonlocal exchange form-factor calculations of the elastic scattering channel exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few experiments have been reported for scattering from free atoms [17][18][19][20], the case for which cross sections are usually calculated. In view of the basic need for accurate and absolute measurements in free atoms to assess the importance of various approximations, we have explored scattering from neon at 90 ± in the 11 to 22 keV range where sizable differences (up to 16%) between the S-matrix and nonlocal exchange form-factor calculations of the elastic scattering channel exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, [15,16] In a previous work [14], it was demonstrated that the real anomalous scattering factors f'(co) calculated by Cromer and I.iberman [17,18] "p, {r)sin(qr)r' g;(q)=4m (4) 0 g'(~) = fci (~) -fci (~) . (7) As shown earlier [14] Relativistic second-order S-matrix calculations were carried out in the cases of relatively strongly bound or "inner" subshells for which the ratio of photon energy to the subshell binding energy was less than 300. This condition is satisfied in the case of tantalum for example by EC, L, M, and N, to N3 subshells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%