2019
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large angular scale fluctuations of near-infrared extragalactic background light based on the IRTS observations

Abstract: Abstract We measure the spatial fluctuations of the Near-Infrared Extragalactic Background Light (NIREBL) from 2° to 20° in angular scale at the 1.6 and $2.2\, \mu \mathrm{m}$ using data obtained with Near-Infrared Spectrometer (NIRS) on board the Infrared Telescope in Space (IRTS). The brightness of the NIREBL is estimated by subtracting foreground components such as zodiacal light, diffuse Galactic light, and integrated star light from the observed sky. The for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the ZL, the diffuse sky emission may contain residual airglow (unless the observing platform is entirely beyond Earth's orbit), and diffuse galactic light (DGL). The optimal technique for separating the DGL and ZL+Airglow remains controversial (Kim et al 2019). The intensity of the DGL is 5 to 10 times larger than the EBL, and the ZL+Airglow varies from 30 to 100 times the EBL (Mattila et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the ZL, the diffuse sky emission may contain residual airglow (unless the observing platform is entirely beyond Earth's orbit), and diffuse galactic light (DGL). The optimal technique for separating the DGL and ZL+Airglow remains controversial (Kim et al 2019). The intensity of the DGL is 5 to 10 times larger than the EBL, and the ZL+Airglow varies from 30 to 100 times the EBL (Mattila et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, EBL fluctuation analyses have also consistently reported excess fluctuations over those expected from the IGL (Kashlinsky et al 2005;Thompson et al 2007;Matsumoto et al 2011;Kashlinsky et al 2012;Cooray et al 2012;Zemcov et al 2014;Mitchell-Wynne et al 2015;Seo et al 2015;Kim et al 2019;Matsumoto & Tsumura 2019). One explanation is emission from the epoch of reionization (Kashlinsky et al 2005;Matsumoto et al 2011;Kashlinsky et al 2012;Mitchell-Wynne et al 2015), while other studies suggest IHL contributes most of the excess fluctuations (Cooray et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Figure 2 shows the angular dependence of the observed fluctuations in the H band. Sources fainter than ∼12, ∼15, ∼27, and ∼28 AB magnitudes are masked for images of IRTS, 69 ) CIBER, 68 ) HST (CANDELS) 66 ) and HST (NDF), 65 ) respectively. The ordinate indicates fluctuation, ( q 2 P 2 ( q )/2π) 1/2 , where P 2 ( q ) and q represent the power spectrum and wavenumber, respectively.…”
Section: Previous Observations Of the Optical And Near-infrared Eblmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IHL is useful in energetics, although no observational evidence of IHL has been reported to date. However, there are difficulties to invoke IHL to explain large fluctuations at the degree scale 69 ) and the excess EBL. Furthermore, IHL cannot explain a good correlation between near-infrared EBL and the X-ray background.…”
Section: Previous Observations Of the Optical And Near-infrared Eblmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation