2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-area surface-patterned Li metal anodes fabricated using large, flexible patterning stamps for Li metal secondary batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Lithium-metal battery (LMB), with its unparalleled specific capacity (3860 mA h g −1 ) and the extremely low reduction potential (−3.04 V vs standard hydrogen electrode) of lithium (Li) metal anode, is regarded as a promising candidate for the next generation ultra-high energy density (>300 W h kg −1 ) rechargeable battery. [4][5][6] Unfortunately, hindered by its high reactivity and large volume variation during realizing a greatly prolonged effective duration of the additive. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations confirm that the reduction potential of Ca 2+ in EC/DEC is lower than that of Li + , which means that partially generated Ca 2+ will adhere to the protuberances of Li metal without being reduced and repulse Li + from depositing at the tips to form dendrites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Lithium-metal battery (LMB), with its unparalleled specific capacity (3860 mA h g −1 ) and the extremely low reduction potential (−3.04 V vs standard hydrogen electrode) of lithium (Li) metal anode, is regarded as a promising candidate for the next generation ultra-high energy density (>300 W h kg −1 ) rechargeable battery. [4][5][6] Unfortunately, hindered by its high reactivity and large volume variation during realizing a greatly prolonged effective duration of the additive. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations confirm that the reduction potential of Ca 2+ in EC/DEC is lower than that of Li + , which means that partially generated Ca 2+ will adhere to the protuberances of Li metal without being reduced and repulse Li + from depositing at the tips to form dendrites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that lowering the effective current density and Li nucleation overpotential through increasing the electroactive surface area of electrodes would be beneficial in preventing the formation of Li dendrites. Therefore, it is crucial to design electrode architectures with a sizable electroactive surface area. Recently, extensive efforts have been dedicated to Li metal anode protection by developing three-dimensional (3D) hosts and constructing structured Li anodes. , The reported composite Li-based 3D host and structured Li anodes, mainly prepared via melting or electroplating methods and mechanical surface modification, respectively, demonstrated a largely increased specific surface area and a decreased current density, making significant advancements in uniform Li deposition/dissolution and rate capability due to the improved Li + interfacial transport kinetics. For instance, a ZnO-coated 3D polymeric matrix achieved a stable composite Li anode and efficient dendrite suppression in carbonate electrolytes at a high current density of 5 mA cm –2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, tremendous innovative strategies have been presented to overcome Si challenges for powder-based LIBs, such as powder nanosizing, 15 morphology control, 16,17 surface coating, 17,18 composite formulation, 19,20 doping, 21 functional binder composites, 22,23 and electrolyte optimization. 24,25 While it might be more daunting to tackle these issues for thin films limited by geometric constraints, 26,27 recently, multiscale micro-pattern design has emerged widely for thin film anode materials such as Li metal, 28,29 pure-Si, 30,31 composites, 32,33 and copper current collectors, 34 even expanding to cathodes 35 and entire cells, 36,37 to effectively facilitate stress evolution. It is well known that the eigen deformation of a free-standing material does not lead to mechanical stress, but only to self-compatible deformations, and eigen-strain-induced stresses are generated when the eigen strain is constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%