2002
DOI: 10.1137/s0040585x97979238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Deviations in the Approximation by the Poisson Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many papers have been written on this subject. The most general results are contained in [5], [6], and [7], where analogies of the well-known Cramér theorem on large deviations are deduced. A much more general case than Bernoulli trials is treated therein.…”
Section: By (10) and (18)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many papers have been written on this subject. The most general results are contained in [5], [6], and [7], where analogies of the well-known Cramér theorem on large deviations are deduced. A much more general case than Bernoulli trials is treated therein.…”
Section: By (10) and (18)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A much more general case than Bernoulli trials is treated therein. However, from the standpoint of practical calculations the results obtained in [5], [6], and [7] are not quite convenient.…”
Section: By (10) and (18)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As before, y = (x − nν 1 )/(nν 1 ), defined in (1). Let us denote the distribution of Z * n by Π * .…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…и факториальные кумулянты Г к = Тк(Х) соответственно, т.е. если ~ЕХ 8 = А, В работах [1]- [3] авторы исследовали вероятности больших уклонений для случайной величины X, аппроксимируемой пуассоновской случай ной величиной rj\. При этом условия налагались на рост факториальных кумулянтов.…”
unclassified
“…Для оценки вероятностей Р{Х ^ ж} при х ^ АА 7 нам придется пользоваться только неравен ствами больших уклонений. Для случая 7 = 0, когда X принимают только целочисленные значения, такое неравенство получено в работе[3] (лемма 2).…”
unclassified