2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2004.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Eddy Simulations of a spatially developing incompressible 3D mixing layer using the v–ω formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mixing layer flows, however, are known to exhibit a hypersensitivity to their initial conditions [3,22], and it is reasonable to assume that the simulated mixing layer will also display this behaviour. Balaras et al [23] have shown that the evolution of temporal mixing layers is significantly affected by the nature of the inflow condition, whilst Tenaud et al [16] demonstrated that the use of an analytical Whitfield profile [24] to describe a turbulent inflow condition required large freestream disturbance values to produce a growth rate in the layer that was comparable to experiment. For mixing layers that initiate from laminar conditions, there has been no direct comparison on the effects of using a hyperbolic tangent or boundary layer profile to describe the inflow condition of the layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mixing layer flows, however, are known to exhibit a hypersensitivity to their initial conditions [3,22], and it is reasonable to assume that the simulated mixing layer will also display this behaviour. Balaras et al [23] have shown that the evolution of temporal mixing layers is significantly affected by the nature of the inflow condition, whilst Tenaud et al [16] demonstrated that the use of an analytical Whitfield profile [24] to describe a turbulent inflow condition required large freestream disturbance values to produce a growth rate in the layer that was comparable to experiment. For mixing layers that initiate from laminar conditions, there has been no direct comparison on the effects of using a hyperbolic tangent or boundary layer profile to describe the inflow condition of the layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Analytical hyperbolic tangent profiles [14,18,19], time-dependent inflow data from precursor boundary layer (BL) simulations [20], and analytical BL profiles [16,21] have all been used to describe the initial condition of the flow in both direct numerical simulation (DNS) and LES, with each study giving reasonably good comparisons with their respective reference experiments. Mixing layer flows, however, are known to exhibit a hypersensitivity to their initial conditions [3,22], and it is reasonable to assume that the simulated mixing layer will also display this behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhou & Pereira (2000) and Wang & Milane (2006) have performed two-dimensional spatial simulations which successfully replicated the entrainment, mixing and chemical reaction in the low-Reynolds-number isothermal reacting mixing layer studied experimentally by Masutani & Bowman (1986) whilst two-dimensional simulations of fully turbulent laboratory mixing layers have been attempted by Jaberi et al (1999) and Yang et al (2004aYang et al ( , 2004b. Three-dimensional simulations of fully turbulent laboratory mixing layers have been reported by Li, Balaras & Piomelli (2000), Tenaud et al (2005), Li, Balaras & Wallace (2010) and Biancofiore (2014). In most of these studies the principal motivation for making comparisons with experimental data has been to test aspects of the LES methodology and in no case was any very detailed study made of the evolution of the coherent structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 The capability of Large Eddy Simulation (LES) to capture the large-scale structures of the flow has been demonstrated, 25 yet very few LES studies of the fully three-dimensional flow have compared simulation data directly to experiment. 26,27,28 Recent work by the present authors has demonstrated that the use of a 'white-noise' type fluctuation superposed onto the inflow condition does not result in a simulation which predicts stationary streamwise vortices, 29 a feature that has also been observed in previous simulations of the pre-transition mixing layer. 22 Further, an initially-turbulent mixing layer simulation also did not produce statistically stationary streamwise structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%