2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-021-01316-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large felid habitat connectivity in the transboundary Dawna-Tanintharyi landscape of Myanmar and Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified suitable C. sumatraensis and B. gaurus habitats in Dawna-Tanintharyi Landscape (DTL), Western Forest Complex, Kaeng Krachan and Kuiburi, which are transboundary parks connecting Myanmar and Thailand. These areas were identified as important conservation areas to build habitat connectivity for maintaining large felids, their prey, and other animal populations (Greenspan et al, 2021). However, our models predicted low suitability areas where C. sumatraensis has been recorded in Myanmar, such as Hkakaborazi NP and Hponkanrazi (Lwin et al, 2021;Rao et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We identified suitable C. sumatraensis and B. gaurus habitats in Dawna-Tanintharyi Landscape (DTL), Western Forest Complex, Kaeng Krachan and Kuiburi, which are transboundary parks connecting Myanmar and Thailand. These areas were identified as important conservation areas to build habitat connectivity for maintaining large felids, their prey, and other animal populations (Greenspan et al, 2021). However, our models predicted low suitability areas where C. sumatraensis has been recorded in Myanmar, such as Hkakaborazi NP and Hponkanrazi (Lwin et al, 2021;Rao et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Given leopards have already disappeared quickly from most parts of their range across Southeast Asia (Rasphone et al, 2019; Rostro‐García et al, 2016), we believe the greater Kweekoh landscape should be considered a priority area for leopard conservation action. Moreover, Kweekoh may be connected to other habitats in the Kawthoolei region and may receive emigrant leopards from western Thailand (Greenspan et al, 2021). Given low population densities, however, future breeding is far from assured, particularly if underlying pressures (e.g., poaching and habitat loss) persist or worsen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to officially incorporate this area into the protected area system, including active patrols by rangers in this habitat, could help further safeguard leopard populations. Moreover, Kweekoh is adjacent to WEFCOM, a regional large felid stronghold in Thailand, to and from which protected movement and dispersal corridors could help bolster transboundary leopard populations (Greenspan et al, 2021). Future efforts might attempt to identify those species targeted by local hunters, such as through interviews, and the level of trade in leopard parts (and other species) that exists among communities surrounding Kweekoh, as the illegal wildlife trade is a general problem in the region (Oswell, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoring vegetation between Kui Buri and Kaeng Krachan National Parks could promote the movement of dhole and their prey, in contrast to Lenya and Nga Wun Reserve Forests which are separated by the Maw daung‐Singkhon highway. A physical habitat corridor would need to be developed to promote wildlife movement, which itself would require serious political commitment as the management of habitat across this transboundary forest complex will be challenging (Greenspan et al, 2021). Other suitable patches that are isolated and would require connectivity to be restored in the landscape for them to function as habitats for dhole include patches in northern Myanmar (patch 6, 8, 10, 15, 16; Figure 3), northern Thailand (area 20; Figure 3), and the Dong Phayayen—Khao Yai Forest Complex of central Thailand (patch 14, 19; Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…promote wildlife movement, which itself would require serious political commitment as the management of habitat across this transboundary forest complex will be challenging (Greenspan et al, 2021). Other suitable patches that are isolated and would require connectivity to be restored in the landscape for them to function as habitats for dhole include patches in northern Myanmar (patch 6, 8, 10, 15, 16; Figure 3), northern Thailand (area 20;…”
Section: Stronghold Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 99%