2013
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.068551-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large mobile genetic elements carrying resistance genes that do not confer a fitness burden in healthcare-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also reported high levels of MGE and antibiotic resistance variation in hospital MRSA clones suggesting frequent movement into and out of isolates, possibly because resistances may have both a selective advantage and a fitness cost on the host bacterium in differing conditions (Knight et al 2012, 2013; Zhou et al 2013; Knoppel et al 2014). Taken together, this data suggest that MGE transfer and loss is common and the high level detected in vivo suggests that sampling studies may be underestimating the variety of mobilomes in populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We have also reported high levels of MGE and antibiotic resistance variation in hospital MRSA clones suggesting frequent movement into and out of isolates, possibly because resistances may have both a selective advantage and a fitness cost on the host bacterium in differing conditions (Knight et al 2012, 2013; Zhou et al 2013; Knoppel et al 2014). Taken together, this data suggest that MGE transfer and loss is common and the high level detected in vivo suggests that sampling studies may be underestimating the variety of mobilomes in populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Isolates belonging to CC8/ST8-t190-IID/IIE Ϯ SCC M1 predominated. Previous studies have demonstrated a reduced fitness associated with larger SCCmec elements (49,50), and we previously speculated that the potential fitness cost associated with carrying a large SCCmec-SCC composite island (CI) may have contributed to the decline of ST8-MRSA-IIA-IIE and SCC M1 (21) in Irish hospitals. However, the many resistance genes detected among isolates of this clone may also have contributed to its decline due to reduced fitness, but other lineage-specific factors may also have contributed (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 12 documented in Portugal, Singapore and Australia [25][26][27]. One feature that may contribute to its success is the SCCmec IV element that this clone carries, which has a lower fitness cost than the larger SCCmec elements such as SCCmec types II and III that were prevalent in earlier HA-MRSA clones [28]. In addition, some variants of CC22 HA-MRSA have acquired the PVL-associated genes, causing outbreaks among neonates in Australia [29] and the UK [30].…”
Section: Hospital-associated Meticillin-resistantmentioning
confidence: 99%