“…Specifically, under the same electric field of 1 MV/cm, the energy performance of the CBNO 350-RTA film (W rec 10.4 J/cm 3 and 93%) was much better than that of the CBNO A700 (W rec 6.4 J/cm 3 and 50.4%). In addition, a longer exposure to the high processing temperature of 700 ℃ helped generate more defects in the CBNO A700 film [28,31], leading to its lower breakdown strength/maximum applicable field, and hence contributes to a lower energy storage capability. The higher breakdown field of the CBNO 350-RTA film, as compared to that of CBNO A350 , is most likely due to the rapid thermal annealing process, which helped improve crystallinity of the film as well as reduce the number and volume ratio of poorly crystallized grain boundaries with many associated defects [32,33].…”