2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14981.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale circulations and energy transport in contact binaries

Abstract: A hydrodynamic model for the energy transport between the components of a contact binary is presented. Energy is transported by a large‐scale, steady circulation carrying high entropy matter from the primary to secondary component. The circulation is driven by the baroclinic structure of the common envelope, which is a direct consequence of the non‐uniform heating at the inner critical Roche lobes due to unequal emergent energy fluxes of the components. The mass stream flowing around the secondary is bound to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AW UMa looks apparently as a typical contact system of W UMa-type with the secondary radius of about 0.5 R ⊙ , yet the detailed observations of this binary obtained by Rucinski (2015) indicate a much more complex geometry of the system, where both components do not actually fill their Roche lobes but are surrounded by the equatorial flow extending up to the inner critical surface. The existence of such a flow in contact and near contact binaries was predicted by Stȩpień (2009) and Stȩpień & Kiraga (2013). The flow redistributes energy between the components resulting in an apparent equality of their effective temperatures what we also see in V8 (see Table 2).…”
Section: V8supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…AW UMa looks apparently as a typical contact system of W UMa-type with the secondary radius of about 0.5 R ⊙ , yet the detailed observations of this binary obtained by Rucinski (2015) indicate a much more complex geometry of the system, where both components do not actually fill their Roche lobes but are surrounded by the equatorial flow extending up to the inner critical surface. The existence of such a flow in contact and near contact binaries was predicted by Stȩpień (2009) and Stȩpień & Kiraga (2013). The flow redistributes energy between the components resulting in an apparent equality of their effective temperatures what we also see in V8 (see Table 2).…”
Section: V8supporting
confidence: 68%
“…An obvious improvement would be to replace the present code with a binary evolution code solving the equations of the internal structure of each component at every time step and allowing for the mass transfer between the components. The next step would be to incorporate the dynamical processes which take place in close binaries but are still poorly understood, like the rapid mass transfer following RLOF with an unknown amount of mass and AM lost from the system (Sarna & De Greve 1996), or the mass flow carrying thermal energy from the primary to secondary component in a contact binary (Stȩpień 2009;Rucinski 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the idea put forward by Lucy (1968Lucy ( , 1976 and Flannery (1976), many authors assume that the expanded component does not relax thermally and stays oversized, transferring mass back to its more massive companion on the evolutionary time scale. It was, however, demonstrated by Stȩpień (2009) that the energy transfer between components of a contact binary takes place in the form of a large-scale circulation bound to the equatorial region of the less massive component. The core energy of that component can be freely radiated by the polar regions and the star remains in thermal equilibrium.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other explanation suggested by Stepien (2007Stepien ( , 2009) comes from the knowledge that the primary star and the secondary star have very different status of evolution, as shown in Figs. 8 and 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%